Search for: "Day v. United Bank" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2014, 3:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The plaintiffs contended that because they had completed the swap contracts transactions in the United States, the swap transactions represented “domestic transactions” within the meaning of the “second prong” of the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Question:  In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:31 am by Stefan Passantino
(Remember the famous line attributed to noted bank robber Willie Sutton when asked why he robbed banks? [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:26 am by Joy Waltemath
The court thus granted in part the government’s motion to dismiss (Martin v The United States, July 31, 2014, Campbell-Smith, P). [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:44 pm by Gene Quinn
Over the last several days I have heard of an alarming trend from the United States Patent and Trademark Office — Patent Examiners are canceling Notices of Allowance and yanking previously granted claims back into prosecution while citing the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Alice v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:44 pm by Gene Quinn
Over the last several days I have heard of an alarming trend from the United States Patent and Trademark Office — Patent Examiners are canceling Notices of Allowance and yanking previously granted claims back into prosecution while citing the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Alice v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
Evidence was also admitted at trial showing that Tolliver worked at Citizens Bank on every day in which her password was used to access one of the accounts. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:30 am by Tiffany Hu
The court also rejected 3Taps’ attempt to invoke the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
Let's have the Press Office of the Episcopal Diocese tell us what happened on Day 7 of the trial, with ECUSA and ECSC putting on their portion of the case (I have added some explanatory notes, taken from my daily postings on the trial over at StandFirm):DAY SEVEN: DIOCESE OF SC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:36 pm by SJM
The test is more likely to be satisfied by a United Kingdom national than a national of another member state (a reference to the habitual residence test in Patmalneice v SSWP [2011] 1 WLR 783 at paragraph 35). [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am by Kedar Bhatia
National Australia Bank (OT09), United States v. [read post]