Search for: "Doe Nos." Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,061
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2011, 5:49 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has described this as an anomaly (Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd and Others (Nos 4 and 5) [2002] QB 783 at 824). [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 3:49 am
Jameel does not over-rule these cases (inded it could not, not being of House of Lords level). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm by Rantanen
Classen Immunotherapies holds three patents that it contends are infringed by virtually everyone: Patent Nos. 6,638,739; 6,420,139; and 5,723,283. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:13 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 6,534,805 (“the ‘805 patent”); 6,651,134 (“the ‘134 patent”); 7,142,477 (“the ‘477 patent”); and 6,262,937 (“the ‘937 patent”). [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent No. 5,597,767 (the ‘767 patent) does not incorporate by reference U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:19 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
The patent right constitutes a property and does not necessarily lead to a monopoly in the economic sense of the term. [read post]
12 May 2012, 8:34 pm
The Applicant also amended the specification so that "the primers listed in Example 2 [now] refer to SEQ ID NOs," including claimed id 6. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
In order to counter this, the Court could have held either that (1) the Supreme Court’s decision does not mean that the law cannot be also traced to any other entries – “ragbag” legislation traceable to more than one entry is permitted; and/or (2) in any case, even with the extended meaning of “practice”, the Act would in pith and substance be under Entries 77 and 78. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:14 am by Tonya Gisselberg
THP Capstar Acquisition Corp, now known as DMX, Inc., Nos. 10-3429-cv and 11-127-cv, Second Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 12:39 am
Aug. 07, 2007) (Nos. 05-1655, 05-1925): Appellant Larry Matthews was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA") to the statutory minimum fifteen-year term of imprisonment. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:20 pm by Eric Schweibenz
(3)  In light of any practical benefits of licensing a group of patents in a portfolio rather than licensing patents individually, does the statute permit expenses in the licensing of an entire portfolio to be considered an investment in the exploitation of the individual asserted patent? [read post]