Search for: "Doe v. Holder" Results 1541 - 1560 of 6,694
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 2:41 am
However, it does not change the current compensation system, in force since 1 January 2012. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:12 am
The author contrasts Judge Bates’ view that the provisions of the DMCA provide enough protection for privacy rights (in Re Verizon DDC 2003) with Judge Garcia’s position that the harm caused by disclosure would be too great a violation of the users’ privacy rights (in Capitol Records, Inc v Does 1-16). [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:20 pm
THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:24 pm by Barry Sookman
” The notice and notice regime (S41.26(1)(b)) does not require an ISP to actually disclose the records to which the provision refers to copyright holders. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 12:55 pm
In practice, this revocation does not immediately suspend driving privileges, because the effective date of the suspension under the statute is either 30 days after the arresting officer or the department gives notice of the suspension or five days after the department gives written notice of its determination to sustain the suspension following the administrative hearing, and in the interim, the license holder continues to enjoy the privilege of driving (as Rehman did here) by… [read post]