Search for: "Does 1 - 64" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2012, 11:39 am by Boris Segalis
However, when Google places a “+1” button on a different website, a user may not understand that Google is collecting other information about that user in conjunction with that “+1” button. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
” [22] On January 17, 2014, during an interview with the british interviewer Andrew Marr, Vladimir Putin said that the law “does not discriminate against gay people” [23]. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
I suggest that the CBA recommendations fall short of articulating a unique standard for family lawyers and why one is necessary.[1] CBA Proposal The CBA recommended change because they suggest the Model Code does not “accurately reflect the contemporary duties and practices of Canadian family law lawyers” (p. 1). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
Cook [1997] 1 SCR 1113 at para. 21) while simultaneously excluding any idea of winning and losing from her assessments? [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
The former ‘implies that a disinterested third party is reporting facts fairly’ (Andrews, 2003: 64). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The opinion also reaffirms the rule that in federal court, only a single named class repreentative must have standing, and affirmed the district court's finding of standing under Prop. 64. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
EO 11246 does not affect grants, and the new EO does not impact the administration of federal grants. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:52 am by Stephen Pitel
  This is a remarkable interpretation of section 4, one which would see many other provisions about subject matter jurisdiction instead read as though they addressed territorial jurisdiction (which she does in footnote 1 in para 109). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Matthew Nied
The former ‘implies that a disinterested third party is reporting facts fairly’ (Andrews, 2003: 64). [read post]