Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 4,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2021, 6:16 pm
A related previous post is ‘Personal Injury and Article 4(3) of Rome II Regulation’, available here https://conflictoflaws.net/2021/personal-injury-and-article-43-of-rome-ii-regulation/ This article compares Owen v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:39 am
Rev. 1, 9 (1999). [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 9:32 am
Judge Esquiroz - 43%2. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
Kibler, 43 M.J. 725, 730 (Army Ct. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:00 am
Commissioner, 115 T.C. 43, 98-99 (2000), aff’d, 299 F.3d 221 (3d Cir. 2002) – Treas. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 10:56 am
The 43(B)log wrote about the case here. [read post]
Chancery Decides: Not Per Se Breach of Fiduciary Duty for a Board to Fail to have a Succession Plan.
1 Jul 2012, 5:50 pm
” See footnote 43. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 7:07 am
The “repair clause” in design law does not have an equivalent in trade mark law. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 11:19 am
The federal government does not take these errors lightly. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 2:16 pm
Officer’s Reasonable Mistake of Law Does Not Render Traffic Stop Unconstitutional, Says New York Court, Illinois DUI Lawyer Blawg, May 4, 2015. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:20 am
§ 325D.45, subdiv. 1. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:45 am
The reduction in acreage of traditional crops would cause a 1% to 3% increase in their value, with a 1% increase in overall farm income from traditional crops. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
This law is not retroactive, and does not apply to first-time misdemeanor offenders found guilty of low-level marijuana possession. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:22 am
Google, Inc.., 676 F.3d 144, 153-54 (4th Circuit 2012)Looking to the six non-exhaustive factors of Section 43(c)(1)(B)(1), the court found insufficient similarity between the marks, no evidence that Defendant intended to associate with the SWATCH mark, and no actual association between the marks. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 9:03 pm
It takes effect on Oct. 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 5:30 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:16 am
When it comes to consumer protection, Brussels Ibis Regulation is the leader and Rome I Regulation is the follower, since special protective rules over consumer contracts were first introduced in Articles 13–15 Brussels Convention[1] and then followed by Article 5 Rome Convention.[2] Package travel in Article 17(3) Brussels Ibis and Article 6(4)(b) Rome I Package travel tourists are explicitly protected as consumers under Article 6(4)(b) Rome I, but not under Article 17(3) Brussels… [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:51 am
The case is Lamesa Investments Limited v Cynergy Bank Limited[1]. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 4:31 am
Press coverage does not identify what the basis for the judge's determination that there was $2 million in policy coverage; one strongly suspects that the insurance company thinks it only has $1 million in policy coverage (and less strongly suspects that the difference is due to a stretched interpretation of the "occurrence" language in the policy), though at this point fighting over that $1 million could subject the insurer to much more liability for… [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
Farmland erosion has reduced by 43% in the last 20 years. [read post]
