Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 1541 - 1560 of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2013, 3:33 am by Florian Mueller
And on Friday (December 6), the Munich I Regional Court will announce a ruling on a German Nokia v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Many officeholders in European monarchies bought their offices as part of a mutual bargain, and in return for their investment, their office was protected as property – especially in England. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
**Amazingly, wager of battle was not officially abolished in England until 1818.***264 NY 248 (1934). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 6:57 am by Samuel Cohen
In England, a recent decision of the High Court highlights the strategic tensions at play for companies facing criminal investigation and subsequent or parallel civil litigation. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
 The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:12 pm
In that case the State of Spain brought proceedings in England for the issuance of letters of administration of the goods of a deceased Spanish national to the duly constituted attorney of the Spanish State. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am by The Charge
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by INFORRM
Decisions In her judgement (Vardy v Rooney [2021] EWHC 1888 (QB)), Mrs Justice Steyn ordered that some of Rooney’s Defence should be struck out (though not all of the parts that Vardy sought). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:43 pm
" -- Notes by Edward Gordon Vázquez Menchaca, Fernando (1512-1569). [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:28 am by INFORRM
Please note, the discussion below is largely focussed on the courts in England and Wales, rather than the other UK jurisdictions. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
Indeed Lady Hale identified a number of judgments which she believes benefitted from the availability of her female perspective (including the case of Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust, which concerned “the damage done to a woman by an unwanted pregnancy”, or the case of Stack v Dowden, a famous case concerning joint ownership of a family home). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am by Marta Requejo
Clause 19.1 of the licence stated: Any claim arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be governed by the internal substantive laws of England and Wales and the parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts. [read post]