Search for: "Ex parte Cross" Results 1541 - 1560 of 1,666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
, US CAFC throws out jury patent infringement verdict, raises potentially invalidating prior art: Finisar v DirecTV: (Patent Prospector), (Hal Wegner), (EDTexweblog.com), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IP Law360), (Patently-O), (Patently-O), Global Global - General Further resolution needed to keep IP issues in WTO negotiations: (Intellectual Property Watch), Mobile phone manufacturers seek to control rising IP costs: (Intellectual Property Watch), Managing trade secrets for… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
The security of human rights and the safety of free 4 institutions require freedom of action on the part of the court. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
  A subpoena was issued and served upon the ex-husband in Rhode Island to call him in the presentation of our case. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Smith, No. 07-1246 ( http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/1st/071246.html ) Sentence for failure to appear in court as part of a supervised release revocation hearing is affirmed where the district court correctly determined that the relevant punishment is the period of incarceration available for the underlying offense which led to the imposition of the supervised release condition, rather than the period of incarceration available for the supervised release violation. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  The last part asks the Court to assume that individual consumers and employees can vindicate their legal rights without a class action. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 At least some part of the constraining of discretion must be internal, through the self-restraint inherent in the public prosecution tradition. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 10:47 am by Adam Thierer
”  King Thamus then passed judgment himself about the impact of writing on society, saying he feared that the people “will receive a quantity of information without proper instruction, and in consequence be thought very knowledgeable when they are for the most part quite ignorant. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm by Paul Levy
”  The Court crossed out the pre-printed language “and therefore liable for damages” and hand-wrote the following: “This is different from determining that they are the publisher solely because of the posting. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Quarterman, No. 07-70004 Denial of an application for a certificate of appealability following denial of habeas relief is affirmed in part, but reversed in part where, in light of the recent decision in Snyder v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:44 am
The frequently asked questions posted at the website for the District of Arizona Bankruptcy Court are a great resource for anybody who wants to learn more about the bankruptcy process. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
Part of the fine, $6,450, will go to the agency’s Clean Diesel School Bus Program, with the rest directed to the EPA’s risk management plan fund. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Unapologetic Ex-Ambassador Avoids Prison in Illicit Lobbying Case MSN – Craig Whitlock (Washington Post) | Published: 9/16/2023 Richard Olson Jr., a former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates, was sentenced to three years’ probation and a $93,350 fine for violating federal lobbying and ethics laws in a case that exposed a secret history of romantic liaisons and lavish gifts during his 34-year career as a diplomat. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Alternatively, the court (well, technically a magistrate) was asked to prohibit plaintiff's informal - so-called "ex parte" visits by plaintiff's counsel. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Igor Danchenko’s role in providing information to British ex-spy Christopher Steele, who compiled the accusations about Trump in a series of reports, has been a subject of scrutiny from internal Department of Justice investigators and special counsel John Durham. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
The Bankruptcy Court rejected both arguments, granted Espinosa's motion in relevant part, denied United's cross-motion, and ordered all claimants to cease and desist their collection efforts. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  Since we originally wrote that post in mid-2007, prompted by the terrible decision in State ex rel. [read post]