Search for: "F. v. R."
Results 1541 - 1560
of 20,304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am
Arizona (d, f, g, w, pp) 2.59% > $0 2.59% > $0 $12,550 $25,100 n.a. n.a. $100 credit 3.34% > $27,272 3.34% > $54,544 4.17% > $54,544 4.17% > $109,088 4.50% > $163,632 4.50% > $327,263 8.00% > $250,000 8.00% > $500,000 Arkansas (h, i, o, dd, oo) 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,200 $4,400… [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
I'm continue to serialize my forthcoming UC Davis Law Review article What Cheap Speech Has Done: (Greater) Equality and Its Discontents; you can read the Introduction, but in this post I'm talking about how "cheap speech" has brought back criminal remedies for libel. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 7:57 pm
by Dennis Crouch Amgen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
Newlink Genetics Corp., 965 F.3d 165, 174-76 (2d Cir. 2020); Jaroslawicz v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm
For example, the Georgia Court of Appeals found that a tax return preparation firm made reasonable efforts to maintain the secrecy of its customers’ list because it: (i) did not publish the list; (ii) established companywide policies to protect the information from disclosure to third parties; (iii) counseled its employees regarding the policies; (iv) limited access to its customer database to certain employees and the information was password protected; and (v) employees permitted… [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am
., Doe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:46 am
In Oswald v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:46 am
In Oswald v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:46 am
In Oswald v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Leeson, Jr., in the case of Wright v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 11:14 am
Harris, 729 F.3d 937, 948 (9th Cir. 2013). [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
" F. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
"Preliminary" means that the ECJ answers the question, and then the national court resumes its proceedings and enters its judgment, as opposed to a traditional appeal from a final judgment.When I saw the question referred to the ECJ, I already noticed that it was very well written, and I wish the Dusseldorf Regional Court had done a similarly good job in that Nokia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 8:55 am
V. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:16 am
******************************************* [1] Decision dated December 16, 2021 in IA 6441 of 2020 in InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:01 am
In R v Suter, the Supreme Court of Canada explained collateral consequences in the context of sentencing as follows: a collateral consequence includes any consequence arising from the commission of an offence, the conviction for an offence, or the sentence imposed for an offence, that impacts the offender. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:26 pm
The Cuban government announced, as is its habit now, through the show "Mesa Redonda", a set of potentially far ranging reforms of the non state sector and its regulation. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 2:17 pm
This was recently illustrated in a recent Appellate Division decision, Goethals v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 11:41 am
R. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 8:46 am
M/V ARIS T, 427 F. [read post]
