Search for: "Family Express Corporation" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2013, 5:02 am by Cari Rincker
  Furthermore, each partner has the ability to bind the partnership without the express written consent of all partners. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Karen Dyck
Why (ditto) can’t para-legals do family work? [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
There are plenty of precedents as to corporations when it comes to the freedom of expression. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:53 am by Joel Brenner
  Expressions of high dudgeon are nevertheless gleefully encouraged by European competitors of U.S. cloud service providers, who are probably losing about $20 billion in business to their E.U. competitors based on the incomprehensibly silly idea that European security services do not collect data on EU citizens. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Mike Madison
 As a young lawyer, I practiced in a small firm in San Francisco that supported a range of clients — small; large; elite and corporate; Mom-and-Pop businesses; individuals. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 11:53 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
But see  -- > Texas DTPA and Texas Debt Collection Act.American Express, for example will insist, either as a term of granting credit in the first instance, or by way of notice to card holders later, that certain types of credit or charge cards it issues are business cards and may only be used for business purposes even if the cardmember is an individual operating a sole proprietorship, which is not a distinct legal entity under Texas law.American Express is known for… [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:20 pm by LindaMBeale
Though he grew up in a religious family and read the Bible (one of the few books the family had) and quoted from it liberally throughout his life, he never joined any church. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:03 pm
., Larry Catá Backer, "Dynamic Societal Constitutionalism: Transnational corporations’ outward expression of inward self-constitution: The enforcement of human rights by Apple, Inc [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:48 am
First to speak was Noam Mushkin (Perrigo) on "Managing a global corporate patent portfolio". [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:03 am by Doorey
Several of the employees call the union and express interest in organizing a union. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 11:53 am by Stephen Bilkis
While the mother testified that the father was excited about the prospect of starting a family with her and that he intended to leave his wife, the father denied ever expressing such an intention. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:39 pm by Geoff Cockrell
The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 3:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In addition to adding subdivision three to Family Court Act § 311.4, the legislation amends article 7 of the Family Court Act and it created Title 8-A of the state Social Services Law which creates an extensive regime of services for children who are "sexually exploited". [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  To the contrary, my religious beliefs dictate women’s equality, equal dignity, and the right to choose when to have a family. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Anne-Marie Rhodes
Anne-Marie Rhodes Professor David Horton argues that testation is a form of expressive speech that may raise Constitutional concerns. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Anne-Marie Rhodes
Anne-Marie Rhodes Professor David Horton argues that testation is a form of expressive speech that may raise Constitutional concerns. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:52 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
”—Jürg Steiner *          *          *“Modern democracy is the tradition in which the implications of human responsibility for human arrangements are gradually made explicit—not only in cities and states, but also in civil society, in corporations, and in families. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm by familoo
The Court of Appeal cite with approval what was said in Strasbourg in YC v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR 967, para 134: ‘Family ties may only be severed in very exceptional circumstances and .. everything must be done to preserve personal relations and, where appropriate, to ‘rebuild’ the family. [read post]