Search for: "Fire Protection Services, Inc." Results 1541 - 1560 of 1,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Money Management International, Inc (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB says PAPERCLIP CLUB for office supply services not confusingly similar to PAPERCLIP for office furniture: In re The Paperclip Club, LLC (not precedential) ( [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
Upland Wings, Inc., of Sullivan, Mo., agreed to the penalty in an administrative consent agreement and final order placed on public notice today in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:17 pm
Thus the City’s action in discarding the tests was a violation of Title VII.By way of background, the Supreme Court noted that the City had employed an outside, independent entity, Industrial/Organizational Solutions, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:02 am
No. 1, Inc., initially incorporated as the Mineola Park Hook and Ladder in 1910 as what is currently denominated a not-for-profit corporation, contracted with the Town of North Hempstead to provide for fire protection for years 2004-2008 on a “flat fee basis. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:48 am
Lastis ( 515 U.S. 347 (1995)) found that workers who spend less than 30 percent of their time in the service of a vessel on navigable waters are presumed not to be seaman with Jones Act protection. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm by WIMS
Access legislative details for S.J.Res. 26 (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection, February 26, 2010 United Parcel Service has agreed to pay a $53,931 civil penalty to U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Victoria and Richard MacKenzie-Childs (Property, Intangible) TTAB finds service mark application void ab initio for non-use because services were not rendered prior to filing: Parametric Technology Corporation v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Victoria and Richard MacKenzie-Childs (Property, Intangible) TTAB finds service mark application void ab initio for non-use because services were not rendered prior to filing: Parametric Technology Corporation v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
”The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth’ (Masson v New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 US 496, 516… [read post]