Search for: "First Holding Corporation"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 18,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
§ 1350, a statute enacted by the first Congress as part of the Judiciary Act of 1789. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
The first exception is when the disposition of assets is to a domestic or foreign corporation or other business entity in consideration for the non-redeemable equity securities of the acquiring party or its parent. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 2:38 pm
Eight of them occur to me, of which the first four listed below are uniquely in the legal domain. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 10:54 am
Appellate Division Holds That Status of Pre-1983 Purchaser as “Innocent Party” Applied to Current Owner Despite Property Transfers Among Family Members Via Trusts appeared first on Real Property & Environmental Law Alert. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
Second, the Ninth Circuit holds that there can be corporate liability under the ATS. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:53 am
The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Averill was not required to give notice to a dissolved corporation. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
First, let’s look at the facts. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Moreover, the government still holds a large percentage of the shares. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:32 am
First, some courts have held shareholders in closely-held corporations owe each other fiduciary duties, like those of partners in partnerships. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 3:31 am
(…) As we stated in American Queen, the Ninth Circuit has a conjunctive test: there must be domination and control and injustice from not piercing the veil and some form of ill intent. 708 F.2d at 1489–90; see also Seymour, 605 F.2d at 1109–13 (first articulating the three requirements to pierce the corporate veil in the context of a labor dispute and applying them conjunctively). [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:31 am
The post Why Nonprofit Governance is Different from For-profit Governance appeared first on Nonprofit Law Blog. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
First, the courts have already thrown up substantial barriers to shareholder actions. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:40 am
In MAG IAS Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:40 am
In MAG IAS Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:32 am
Wren Holdings, LLC and Berger v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:18 pm
The post Chancery Decides: Expert Witness Must Be Individual–Not Entity appeared first on Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:40 pm
The slogans cannot include the name of any person or a corporation located in New Jersey without their written consent. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 2:05 pm
Overview of Holding The court recognized that: “the performance of a Stockholder Agreement giving corporations or corporate insiders rights of first refusal over the shares of other stockholders is not governed by any generalized fiduciary duty of disclosure nor is it governed by any generalized application of the duty of loyalty. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:50 pm
Judge Robinson first determined that the defendant, Taylor Family Holdings, was amenable to jurisdiction and venue in the District of Delaware. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:42 am
Cardin is a lawyer but appears to hold an extraconstitutional view of free speech. [read post]
