Search for: "HOLMES v. HOLMES"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 1,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
In Bradford v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
” It was assumed that such adaptation would invoke Article V at the national level. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
His point about balance and the quote he offers from Justice Holmes are indeed helpful, and I agree with his assessment of Rahimi. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
That was certainly true of Wechsler’s essay, even though it was “merely” the Holmes Lecture at the Harvard School, funded by the Holmes Devise that the Justice left to the United States on his death. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
An analogous dynamic is described in the famous Delaware Chancery case, Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
” Hence Oliver Wendell Holmes’s famous statement that “it is the merit of the common law that it decides the case first and determines the principle afterwards. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 am
Oliver Wendell Holmes once remarked that the epigraph on his tombstone should read, "Here lies the supple tool of power. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
As a Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote in the 1892 case of McAuliffe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:08 am
Evidence from Unicorns Posted by Yao Zeng, University of Washington, on Monday, January 23, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Capital formation, Cash flows, Dual-class stock, Institutional Investors, Liquidity, Mutual funds, Oversight, Private equity, Private firms, Risk, Tech companies, Venture capital firms “Fair Value” to be Determined by Merger Price—Merion v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:49 pm
This question was answered by the Hague Court of Appeal on 2 November 2010 in GlaxoSmithKline v Pharmachemie (a member of the Teva group). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Ct. 1640 (2010) (Apr. 21, 2010), the United States Supreme Court held that a plan adminstrator’s discretionary authority to interpret a plan is entitled to deference, even if a prior determination with regard to the same claim was invalid.Estate planning with retirement assetsArnstein & LehrFor many individuals, retirement benefits represent a significant portion of their wealth.Second Circuit finds that class arbitration waiver clause is unconscionable, refuses to compel… [read post]
27 May 2022, 3:58 pm
Holmes (Ky. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:54 am
Pena dissent to distinguish discriminatory from acceptable affirmative action policies, or, most recently, the pungent conclusion from his Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
In, Graney v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:04 am
The cases brought by citizens against compulsory vaccination, and in particular, Jacobson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:07 am
First and foremost is the Oracle v. [read post]
