Search for: "Harder v. Harder" Results 1541 - 1560 of 4,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2014, 8:45 am
Copyright infringement is becoming harder to control and a problem for which no adequate solution has been found yet. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:26 pm by daniel
Beginning with a California Supreme Court decision called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm by daniel
This week, the Federal Circuit issued an encouraging ruling that will make it harder to use this gambit. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:24 am by Michael Risch
Consider how powerful the Samsung emails about keeping up with the iPhone were in the Apple v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm by Florian Mueller
It's much harder to argue to an appeals court that two juries in a row were unreasonable than to say the same about a single jury.From a strategic point of view, Apple actually scored an even more important victory over Samsung on Monday with an appeals court ruling that the district court had erred in denying Apple a permanent injunction against infringing Samsung products, giving Apple a new opportunity to obtain an injunction on remand to the district court.Here's the verdict form (this… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Brendan Kevenides
 In Smart, the City wanted the jury instructed in such a way that would have increased the plaintiff's/bicyclist's burden at trial, making it harder for the jury to find in his favor. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Harder, but with its own virtues, is "approval voting," whereby voters are asked to indicate all of the candidates they'd in fact "approve of" with regard to their becoming president. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:24 am by Florian Mueller
Compared to the FRAND rate-setting opinions by Judges Robart and Holderman, last week's Wi-LAN v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals therefore rejects the more plaintiff-friendly "motivating factor" calculus that governs cases brought under Title VII.The case is Natofsky v. [read post]