Search for: "Holiday v. State" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm by Lyle Denniston
The ruling in the case of Grady v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
Fund Co., 69 NY2d 559, 568, 509 N.E.2d 51, 516 N.Y.S.2d 451 n 5; [**6] Smith v Sapienza, 52 NY2d 82, 87, 417 N.E.2d 530, 436 N.Y.S.2d 236), nor owed an independent duty to the Barket defendants (see Raquet v Braun, 90 NY2d 177, 182, 681 N.E.2d 404, 659 N.Y.S.2d 237; Garrett v Holiday Inns, 58 NY2d 253, 258-261, 447 N.E.2d 717, 460 N.Y.S.2d 774; Nolechek v Gesuale, 46 NY2d 332, 338-341, 385 N.E.2d 1268, 413 N.Y.S.2d 340). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
If so, should it be an entirely private entity, or should it be recognised in some way by the State, or should it be a public body? [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the decision applies only to a category of ostensibly public workers who aren’t “full-fledged” state employees, and to which the High Court’s 1977 holding in Abood v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
While States have substantial authority to regulate land use, see Village of Euclid v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Case C-484/14 McFadden is a reference for a preliminary ruling from CJEU-loving Member State Germany, seeking clarification as regards the liability of a freely-accessible wi-fi provider for third-party copyright infringements committed via that wireless network. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am by Don Cruse
A state-court judgment in violation of the bankruptcy automatic stay is void as a matter of state law. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by CAPTAIN
Hayes, Lisa Lehner, Christine Lopez-Acevedo, Louis V. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:38 am
That's at least part of the lesson from the North Carolina Court of Appeals last week in Commercial Credit Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:09 am
Besides the Fourth of July, Thanksgiving is the most participatory and democratic of holidays. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 10:22 am by Giles Peaker
If the parties intended a letting for a fixed period of one month – highly unlikely for anything other than a holiday letting – then the clause would have been worded very differently, and would not have stated that the tenancy would continue from month to month after the first month. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]