Search for: "In Interest of Ac"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 2,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
From that small seed, it was argued by Hounslow, Leeds and Manchester that a gateway (b) defence is not open to a Defendant at all in the county court and, in the alternative, Wandsworth LBC v Winder [1985] AC 461, properly analysed, only gives rights to defend private rights using public law. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
For example, “[w]e have extensive procedures and controls that are designed to identify and address conflicts of interest,” and “[o]ur clients’ interests always come first. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
” Neville v Fine Arts Company [1897] AC 68 per Lord Halsbury LC at 73″. [14] In Spiller v Joseph [2010] UKSC 53 the Supreme Court identified the requirements of the honest comment defence as follows: (1) The comment must be on a matter of public interest. (2) The comment must be recognizable as comment, as distinct from an imputation of fact. (3) The comment must be based on… [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am
That outcome, she said, was against the interests of justice. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
The decision is therefore of interest to libel lawyers, administrative law practitioners and public authorities alike. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
It is in the interest of the State that there should be an end of lawsuits.) [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
As all the fine Private International Law practitioners reading this post will know, forum non conveniens requires the Court’s consideration of the test set out by Lord Goff of Chieveley in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
S. 83, 95 (1968), in which the parties maintain an “actual” and “concrete” interest, Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:31 pm
It’s small wonder the hackback topic has spawned so much interesting debate (see here and here for examples). [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 10:36 pm
I wondered if you'd be interested .... [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:41 am
My client was Real Madrid, and FC Barcelona and AC Milan were our informal allies with respect to broadcasting rights. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
The AmeriKat could entertain (or perhaps bore) some of you with details of their view, but it does not make for a very interesting read because they essentially agreed with Floyd J’s reasoning and upheld him on every point.What was interesting was the point on non-designation of the '908 patent. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 2:59 pm
For the more than 3 million people displaced by conflict in Iraq and the more than 10 million displaced persons across the region, staying inside with the AC on high may not be an option. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Applying the American Cyanamid [1975] AC 396 test, he turned to the first of the three limbs - is there an arguable case. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Pursuant to Family Ct Act § 532(a), a genetic marker test may not be ordered if it is not in the best interests of the child on the basis of equitable estoppel. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing and not on… [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Launch Interactive Tool Note: Each year we review and improve the methodology of the Index. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing and not on… [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:44 pm
AC. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
That’s less than 1% and about 2% respectively of what AC asked for. [read post]
