Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 1541 - 1560
of 42,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 5:42 am
Glenn C. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 12:47 pm
Our colleague Frank C. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 2:36 pm
The post Too Fast, Too Dangerous for Pedestrians appeared first on C. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:08 pm
Of interest to housing lawyers: (a) the Audit Commission (abolish and transfer); (b) National Tenant Voice (abolished – not sure about that, I thought the Gov. just stopped funding it but didn’t actually abolish it); (c) Rent Assessment Committees / Residential Property Tribunal Service (transfer into Tribunal Service); (d) Homes and Communities Agency (still to decide); (e) Leasehold Advisory Service (still to decide); (f) TSA (still to decide – again, not too… [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
§38-38-103(1)(c) will read:If a recorded instrument does not specify the address of the party purporting to have an interest in the property under such recorded instrument, the party shall not be entitled to notice and any interest in the property under such instrument shall be extinguished upon the execution and delivery of a deed pursuant to section 38-38-501. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
§38-38-103(1)(c) will read:If a recorded instrument does not specify the address of the party purporting to have an interest in the property under such recorded instrument, the party shall not be entitled to notice and any interest in the property under such instrument shall be extinguished upon the execution and delivery of a deed pursuant to section 38-38-501. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Accordingly, we thought you may be interested in this update from Curtis Strong, Vice President of the Law School’s International Law Society, discussing the study of international law at U of C. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am
They are: (a) the plaintiff’s interest in preventing wrongful gain or profit from its confidential information (“wrongful gain interest”), as seen from limb (c) of Coco, and (b) the plaintiff’s interest to avoid wrongful loss (“wrongful loss interest”), which is “suffered so long as a defendant’s conscience has been impacted in the breach of the obligation of confidentiality”. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 2:02 pm
Pix credit here I am delighted to pass along information about a quite interesting blog symposium put together by the wonderful folks at Verfassungsblog in cooperation with the German Institute for Human Rights. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:22 am
In 2007, they allegedly succeeded to their deceased mother’s one-third membership interest in a realty holding LLC co-owned by an aunt and uncle who denied that their nephews and niece ever attained member status. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:55 am
But we do find it interesting that, in the recent wave of publicity over Aaron Charney's amended complaint, Sullivan & Cromwell's public relations team at Sard Verbinnen reached out to us. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:47 pm
You can find out additional information about Elena Deutsch over on her website, Women Interested in Leaving Law. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:45 am
Also, the court must consider the factors listed in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) as a prerequisite to “making an award of custody”; must state its factual findings as required by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f); and, in the context of domestic violence, must consider the presumption “that the best interests of the child are served by an award of custody to the non-abusive parent,” N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(b)(11). [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:32 am
See ORS 419B.100(1)(c) (child found to be within jurisdiction of court if child's condition or circumstances "endanger the welfare" of child); ORS 419B.331 (permitting court to place child under protective supervision "[w]hen the court determines it would be in the best interest and welfare of a ward"); ORS 419B.476 (requiring that court "consider the ward's health and safety the paramount concerns" at permanency hearing). [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
This canon clearly mandates a recusal in this case by mandating the following: “C. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:36 pm
There was also a fair amount of debate today on Bill C-38 generally including … read more » [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 3:30 am
The IRS concluded “[b]ecause you operate for the private interests of your members in providing a space and a means for artwork to be viewed and sold rather than promoting the arts in general you are not serving public purposes and do not qualify [under Section 501(c)(3)]. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 12:55 pm
Already in the Abraxis (C-443/17) case, AG Mr. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 5:53 am
Written By: Lenorae C. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:49 am
Interested professionals should visit www.FIFRAtutor.com to view sample course segments and purchase modules.Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. [read post]
