Search for: "In Matter of Adams"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 6,426
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2019, 10:04 am
This testimony would not be allowed in a court proceeding under rules of evidence and due process, where witnesses are permitted to address only matters about which they have direct knowledge. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
Adams, 2019 WL 6135127 (D. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Professor Rafal Sikorski (Adam Mickiewicz University) gave an overview that went back to the first antitrust cases in the U.S. about 100 years ago were (F)RAND was established as a principle. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:20 am
Hill, The Climate Vulnerabilities of Global Nuclear Power Clara Brandi, Dominique Blümer, & Jean-Frédéric Morin, When Do International Treaties Matter for Domestic Environmental Legislation? [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Both of their opening statements are provided below, along with those of Chairman Adam Schiff and Ranking Member Devin Nunes. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am
Adams, 19-309Issues: (1) Whether the First Amendment invalidates a longstanding state constitutional provision that limits judges affiliated with any one political party to no more than a “bare majority” on the state’s three highest courts, with the other seats reserved for judges affiliated with the “other major political party”; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:44 am
When asked by Schiff whether he thought the call was appropriate, Morrison claimed to have no view on the matter. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:19 am
House Intelligence chair Adam Schiff has begun to avoid the less familiar language of “quid pro quo” and test out the more familiar language of “extortion” and “bribery. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 7:40 am
Both of their opening statements as prepared for delivery are below, along with that of Chariman Adam Schiff and Ranking Member Devin Nunes. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Adam M. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 4:52 pm
– Adam Wagner Revisited and Revised: A Human Right to Internet Access? [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
” On Nov. 12, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff told NPR that there’s a clear argument to be made that Trump committed “bribery. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am
On Tuesday 19 November 2019, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R v Adams (Northern Ireland). [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 7:26 am
We should not let this be a partisan attack the way Adam Schiff is conducting himself. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
No one cares about the actual legal issue raised in Marbury—whether Congress can add to the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; it is not relevant to any contemporary litigation, nor, as a matter of fact, does Marbury truly feature as the centerpiece of contemporary articles on constitutional theory, including, for that matter, the propriety of judicial review. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Lawyers for House Democrats maintained it was within Congress’s constitutional authority to seek the records, both as a matter of oversight and as it considered whether new presidential ethics and financial disclosure laws are necessary. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Washington at 67, John Adams at 73, Thomas Jefferson at 83, James Madison at 85, James Monroe at 73, and John Quincy Adams at 80.The requirement would undoubtedly alter how presidential campaigns would run. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
That law, which was adopted to stave off lawsuits targeting speech on matters of public concern, requires dismissal unless the plaintiff shows he is “likely to succeed on the merits. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the justices’ use in recent majority opinions of citations to separate opinions in prior cases, concluding that “[t]he justices utilize this practice in varying degrees, but as a general matter, they appear to frequently look to past separate opinions to rehash old ideas and to help justify new ones. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
President John Adams did not turn to John Marshall as his nominee after an exhaustive search designed to find the single most qualified successor to Oliver Ellsworth. [read post]
