Search for: "In Re Adoption of E"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 4,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Comme la juge l’indique, conclure autrement « serait d’accorder un droit à l’anonymat ex post facto en permettant que la stratégie de défense adoptée puisse créer la situation qui justifie son anonymat »[44]. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm
If you’re in one of the EU’s 27 member countries, it’s a good time to contact your Member of European Parliament and let them know you’re opposed to this dangerous proposal. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:12 am
[T]he New York Court of Appeals has not adopted it . . . and plaintiff cannot even cite an Appellate Division decision adopting the section. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:22 am
The 2002 E-Privacy Directive was significantly changed in 2009 (Directive 2009/136/EC). [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Dans un tel contexte, adopter la position du syndic serait accorder à celui-ci plus de droits que n’en a le débiteur lui-même. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:30 am
Elle est ordonnée par le ministère public mais doit également être confirmée par une autorité judiciaire indépendante, le tribunal des mesures de contrainte. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
Thus, we would not adopt the approach suggested in Jennings in this case. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@taberlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
BB&T Co., 289 Ga. 1 (3) (a) (709 SE2d 267) (2011); In re T.C.D., 281 Ga. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
“I expect that we’re [read post]
6 May 2017, 8:08 am
A paper-development workshop for authors whose submissions have been shortlisted for revision and re-submission is being organised at Aarhus University (Denmark) back-to-back with a seminar on Global Value Chains, tentatively on 5 and 6 December 2017. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
Schwaegler’s February 1, 2011 operative report describes the procedure performed on that date as an “[e]xceptionally difficult L5-S1 reexploration, with re-do decompression, including excision large reherniation . . . [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Baron, “Overcoming the Digital Tsunami in e- [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
It’s bad. http://t.co/okw4JX4piM -> Fox News Motion for Summary Judgment Denied in 9/11 Photograph Fair Use Case http://t.co/zyRIb2JQib -> Intention of e-mail key to privilege: judge http://t.co/yD385R8LEp -> Copyhpe Friday’s Endnotes – 02/20/15 | http://t.co/bzFVymE6Dc -> With the MPAA Watching, ITC Says Case About Teeth Won't Bring Down the Internet – The Hollywood Reporter http://t.co/VmKiPcMRKD -> Oscars: A Guide to Best Picture Intellectual… [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
ALI wasn't close to adopting the prior draft of the "Principles," and it probably isn't much closer to adopting the current draft.Why do we say that? [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
As a starting point, consider the following plainspoken language from the California Supreme Court in In re: Kay: [The government] retains a legitimate concern in ensuring that some individuals’ unruly assertion of their rights of free expression does not imperil other citizens’ rights of free association and discussion. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Under section 5(e) of the CPA: (e) there is a representative plaintiff or defendant who, (i) would fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class, (ii) has produced a plan for the proceeding that sets out a workable method of advancing the proceeding on behalf of the class and of notifying class members of the proceeding, and (iii) does not have, on the common issues for the class, an interest in conflict with the interests of other class members. 1992, c. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 1:00 am
The provisions of the Privacy Code adopted to implement the e-Privacy Directive will of course remain in force. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:21 am
EFFECTIVE DATE The public has 45 days to comment on the proposed rule before it is adopted. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
“More employers will adopt staffing technologies and platforms to seamlessly provide the flexibility hourly workers want. [read post]
