Search for: "In Re Adoption of Rule" Results 1541 - 1560 of 13,465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  Here’s an excerpt from the blog: The SEC’s adopting release does not, however, address the shortening of the T+4 settlement standard currently in place for certain firm commitment offerings under the exemption in Rule 15c6-1(c), as previously discussed in our prior posting (available here). [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:37 am by Todd Dawson
  Similarly, the National Labor Relations Act was passed in 1935, while the Federal Rules were adopted three years later, in 1938. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:56 pm
Thank Goodness It's Friday (and we're still registered to practice before the USPTO),--Bill Heinze [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:25 am by Ailyn Cabico
  On May 23, 2011, Pillsbury IFIM Group submitted a second comment letter on behalf of the California and Florida fund groups to the NASAA commenting on the re-proposal of the model custody rule on April 18, 2011 (the “Re-Proposed Rule”). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by Jerry Kalish
If you’re an employer who sponsors a 401(k) or profit sharing plan, it’s time to amend and restate your plan. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 4:40 am
On 26 February 2008, the European Commission issued an amended proposal to the Solvency II Directive Proposal (COM (2007) 361) which was adopted on 10 July 2007. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
The Court stated the proper analysis of the merger is under the Maryland Business Judgment Rule. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 4:48 pm
The federal law thus is afflicted with some of the same defects as Iowa's 2,000-foot rule, and the same unintended consequences of forcing offenders underground and discouraging sex-crime reporting.Moreover, if Iowa adopts the federal law, the Iowa Department of Public Safety and all 99 county sheriffs will absorb additional expenses and time riding herd on thousands of convicted sex offenders. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by Broc Romanek
EV3, In re Cogent and other decisions of the Delaware Court of Chancery completely validating the use of top-ups. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:08 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The WOTUS rule was controversial because the Obama Administration adopted an expansive interpretation extending federal regulatory jurisdiction quite broadly. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:05 am
Prudence dictates that Texas consider adopting rules that would diminish the risk of significant contamination by flood events like those recently experienced by Colorado and North Dakota. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:26 am
We now adopt those founding principles of this great nation and caution courts against liberal judges ruling on an 'evolving moral standard.' There is nothing in the constitution that allows this country to have evolving moral standards and it is the duty of this and every court to return this country to the standards of the late 1700s. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It does not mean the defendant can run free; it means you have a re-trial. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Ultimately, this case turns on "time, place and manner," a branch of First Amendment case law that allows the government to regulate speech on public property so long as the rules are not intended to stifle the political message and the demonstrators have ample alternatives to promote that message.Here, [plaintiffs] have not demonstrated that the rules adopted by the owners of the property, concededly after the demonstrations began, are not reasonable time,… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 10:36 am by Juan Antunez
 Which is why I keep up with their rules and was interested to learn that effective June 1, 2012 they'd been amended and re-published. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:54 pm by totmauthor
  I argue that it is not, and that in addition the ethics committee must show that the state approved its decision to adopt an interpretation of the ethics rules that was likely to have anticompetitive effects. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
[A] answers it did not cite to Srabian (indeed it did not mention Srabian at all in its opening brief), but merely adopted the dissenting opinion’s reasoning, which is permissible. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:58 am
We shall see what develops and as always expect that our readers will have strong views to express in the comments below (bearing in mind the rules at the bottom of this post).Joint statement from the Chairman of the Administrative Council and the President of the Office 26 March 2015Call for a social dialogueThe Administrative Council acknowledges the results achieved by the Office and its staff which represent the outcomes of the Efficiency and Quality strategy adopted in… [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:06 am by Jon Hyman
""If you're pro-employee you should also be pro-union. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 12:30 am
 Not every judge can hide in probate (apologies to the robed probate readers for that- but as we understand it, there are no trials and most decisions turn on the rule against perpetuities and interpreting cases like In Re: Cox's Estate "Cox died intestate and his executrix challenges the distribution of the pregnant sow whose value was not sufficiently determined... [read post]