Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 1541 - 1560
of 13,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
S.26 (i.e. by the testator and in the presence of two witnesses). [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 8:18 pm
According to the BBC interview with Manzarpour, the aircraft involved was a Berkut 360 kit plane — i.e., a small aircraft sold unassembled to aviation enthusiasts. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Latest news re: Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) Class Action: Judge Ann D. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
Whether you're earning mega-millions or barely eking out a minimum wage, most of us are "at-will" employees, which usually means that we can be fired by our employers at any time. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:26 pm
This convoluted theory held that unless the offending snow and ice that caused the injuries in question was the result of “unnatural accumulation” – i.e., previous shoveling or plowing – then the homeowner was not liable. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:19 am
In re Eddie Bauer Licensing Services LLC, Serial No. 77585551 (May 2, 2011) [not precedential].Bauer sought registration under Section 2(f), claiming continuous and substantially exclusive use since 1984. [read post]
16 May 2022, 6:31 am
In In re Cellular Telephone Partnership Litigation (Mar. 9, 2022), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T, Inc., which was the 98.12% controlling partner of Salem Cellular Telephone Company (the “Partnership”), froze out the minority partners by acquiring the Partnership’s assets and liabilities and then liquidating the Partnership. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:07 am
This letter I wrote will appear in response to it: Re: Acquitted By The Courts, Convicted By Google, Jonathan Kay, Nov. 13. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:26 pm
This convoluted theory held that unless the offending snow and ice that caused the injuries in question was the result of “unnatural accumulation” – i.e., previous shoveling or plowing – then the homeowner was not liable. [read post]
16 May 2022, 6:31 am
In In re Cellular Telephone Partnership Litigation (Mar. 9, 2022), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T, Inc., which was the 98.12% controlling partner of Salem Cellular Telephone Company (the “Partnership”), froze out the minority partners by acquiring the Partnership’s assets and liabilities and then liquidating the Partnership. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:01 am
Now you're just making fun of me.It's a published opinion by Justice Bedsworth. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:07 am
This letter I wrote will appear in response to it: Re: Acquitted By The Courts, Convicted By Google, Jonathan Kay, Nov. 13. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:05 pm
You can see the full list of candidates we’re supporting on my 4/21 blog entry but I’d like to take a moment to elaborate on the Dallas Hispanic PAC’s choice for City Council, District 13 – Ann Margolin. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
This is not the case if you choose to book each component of your holiday separately i.e your flight with one provider, your hotel with another. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
In the recent case of Re Estate of Assunta Marino, 2010 ONSC 5237 (CanLII), the court granted an order to set aside an unopposed judgment passing accounts obtained by the estate trustee, on a Rule 38.11(1) motion brought by a beneficiary who had failed to file a notice of objection to accounts within the prescribed time. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
If you’re a regular reader here, you know that I’ve discussed many times how Google loves fresh content and their recent Penguin (why the name? [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:32 pm
Here is the abstract: This Article aims to contribute to the radical re-thinking of family law that is on-going in the contemporary United States by analyzing recent U.S. developments with respect to same-sex marriage from a transnational perspective. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:56 am
Tell them what to do, and why, i.e., how they will benefit from doing that. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:50 am
In re Viccino's Pizza Restaurants, Inc., Serial No. 77472394 (September 30, 2010) [not precedential].As to the services, Applicant's carry-out restaurants were encompassed by Registrant's recitation of "restaurants. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:04 am
In re Mentor Graphics Corporation, Serial No. 78325604 (March 6, 2008) [not precedential].The PTO first contended that the mark "is being used to to describe a technology" and not to "identify the goods" listed in the application. [read post]
