Search for: "In the Matter of Parker" Results 1541 - 1560 of 1,579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
The text of the petition in Parker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 7:25 pm
The complaint was deficient on a Fourth Amendment claim as a matter of law, but plaintiff would be given a chance to replead. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
" A recent case from the Tax Court, Goode-Parker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 9:58 am
Parker has written a great article concerning the role confidentiality agreements play in Massachusetts medical malpractice settlements. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:11 pm
Circuit to hand down its decision in Parker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:57 am
Dean, Counsel to President Richard Nixon Mickey Edwards, Lecturer at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University; former Member of Congress (R-OK) and Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee Richard Epstein, James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law, The University of Chicago; Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution Bruce Fein, Constitutional Lawyer and International Consultant at Bruce Fein &… [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 12:19 am
Mar. 2, 2007) (Calabresi, Parker, Hall) (per curiam): This short opinion principally confirms, as a general matter, that appellate waivers must be narrowly construed (and in the defendant's favor) and, more specifically, that a standard appellate waiver (wherein the defendant "waives the right to appeal ... any sentence imposed by the Court which is the same as or less than" a specific number of months or years) does not bar an appellate challenge to the district… [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:43 pm
I haven't seen the decision yet, but apparently NMCCA published its response to CAAF's order in Parker. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:01 pm
In fact, Gore never claimed that he "had been to the Texas fires" -- a reference to wildfires that broke out in Parker County, Texas, in 1998. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
Individualized issues that remain - no matter how extensive - are essentially ignored. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 6:38 pm
  Well, the district court "erred . . . not because he considered Wills's sentence in relation to those of his co-defendants, but because he provided no assessment of how Wills was similarly situated to his co-defendants and why that would matter in light of the differences. [read post]