Search for: "JJS"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
This argument was given short shrift by Lord Neuberger who said that, in his opinion, it was wrong [73] and was not supported by the Strasbourg jurisprudence [74] Lord Neuberger’s conclusions were as follows: i) Much of the information on the voicemail messages of the claimants which have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire is likely to have been ‘commercial information or other intellectual property’ within section 72(5); ii) Although some of the information was not ‘commercial… [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:25 pm
Their Honours stated:The husband argued before the trial judge that these contributions were “special” - a proposition rejected by his Honour.Given the approach adopted by the husband at trial, to which the trial judge refers, and the presentation of this aspect of the appeal, we consider it important to emphasise relevant principles applicable to the assessment of contributions.The High Court in Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17; (1986) 161 CLR 513 said (per Mason and Deane JJ at… [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:57 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:56 am
., and STEVENS, THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, ALITO, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except for Part III–A. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:01 am
Abella and Brown JJ. are of the view that the documents sought by the defence do not meet the threshold of “likely relevance” within the meaning of R. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:33 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
See, for example, Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 SCR 259 at para 60 [Wewaykum]; R v RDS, [1997] 3 SCR 484 at para 31, per L’Heureux-Dubé and McLachlin JJ; and para 111, per Cory J. 2. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 9:00 am
("JJ") Janis John T. [read post]
