Search for: "Jess Bravin"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 1,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
” For The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that “Tuesday’s separate 5-4 decision in [an] Arizona murder case,” McKinney v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ariane de Vogue of ABC News, Josh Gerstein of Politico, Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, Jess Bravin and Danny Yadron of the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), and Mark Sherman of the Associated Press. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:20 am
” In today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin have an article headlined “Supreme Court Split Over Religious Exemptions for Birth-Control Coverage; The case involves moral and religious exemptions to an Affordable Care Act rule that employers include contraception coverage with no out-of-pocket costs. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am
” Jess Bravin reports for The Wall Street Journal that “[n]o justice filed a dissent, but three conservative justices issued a statement suggesting they gave little weight to the inmates’ argument. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:43 am
Jess Bravin reports for The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) that the court “is next scheduled to hear oral arguments on March 23, beginning a two-week sitting that will include several significant cases, including legal actions filed by President Trump to prevent Deutsche Bank AG and the Mazars accounting firm from turning over his financial records under subpoenas from House committees and a New York state grand jury. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:00 pm
” Brent Kendall, Jess Bravin, and Stephanie Armour of The Wall Street Journal report that “Supreme Court Leaves Affordable Care Act Intact; The high court preserves the 2010 healthcare law, the signature legislative accomplishment of the Obama administration. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Bill Mears of CNN, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Adam Liptak of the New York Times, the Washington Post’s Robert Barnes, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall of the Wall Street Journal, the WSJ Law Blog’s Nathan Koppel, and the AmLaw Daily’s Zach Lowe all report on the “honest services” rulings, as do the Associated Press, the Dallas Morning News, JURIST, Crime and Consequences, and Courthouse News Service (in two… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
Most reports on the oral argument – including Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Lyle Denniston of this blog, Joan Biskupic of USA Today, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, and Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal – suggest that the Court is likely to strike down the law as unconstitutional. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:39 am
At the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin predicts that Democrats, channeling anger over the U.S. economy and public sentiment against the Court’s Citizens United ruling, will endeavor to “put the court itself on trial” during this summer’s confirmation process. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am
” Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Nina Totenberg of NPR, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle, Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor, Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, Reuters, JURIST, Associated Press, Adam Liptak of the New York Times, and AFP also have coverage of the decision, which Bernard Harcourt (writing at Balkinization) characterizes as “alarming. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
James Vicini for Reuters, Adam Liptak at The New York Times, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Nina Totenberg of NPR and Jess Bravin at The Wall Street Journal reported on the case. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal reports that the court’s decision on Monday in the congressional case “further dim[s] Democratic hopes that congressional investigators could obtain the materials prior to November’s election. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am
” Additional coverage comes from Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal, who remarks that “senators’ opening statements made clear it would be nigh impossible to divorce Judge Gorsuch” “from the deeply divisive circumstances surrounding his nomination by President Trump. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that “[t]he case is the latest in a string of decisions that have given the 1925 Federal Arbitration Act wide powers to displace traditional legal remedies, prioritizing business interests in reducing liability over providing redress to consumers and employees alleging injuries. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am
Jess Bravin reports for The Wall Street Journal that “[d]isregard of precedent is one of [Stevens’] top concerns about John Roberts’s court. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
Ed Whelan, writing for the National Review Online, opines that “critics of the Roberts Court will do their best to ignore” the Court’s decision in Thompson, which he notes is “certainly not a pro-employer result from our supposedly ‘corporatist’ Court,” while Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal similarly notes that the decision was “the latest in a string of employee victories on retaliation. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
Lyle Denniston covered the oral argument for this blog, concluding that the ordinance’s prospects are “quite poor”; other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (registration or subscription required), and Adam Liptak of The New York Times. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:17 am
Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal begins his analysis of Kagan’s positions on counterterrorism thus: “Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan criticized aspects of the Bush administration’s war on terror but she has also advanced arguments for strong counterterrorism policies, leaving relatively little room for critics on the right to attack her on the issue. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:05 pm
id=612&nid=199 ****** Further regarding the Ford letter, see this story by Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2006/12/27/ford-and-the-court/ [read post]
