Search for: "King v. King"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 8,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 4:05 pm
The law, which passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, challenges the Supreme Court to overrule Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
., owned a parcel of real property in Kings Park, which was leased to third parties for use primarily as a bus yard and trucking station. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:39 pm
Gershon v Cunningham, 2016 WL 229867 (NYAD 2 Dept. 1/20/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Standing, Uncategorized [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 11:10 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:21 pm
In Ralston v. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
., owned a parcel of real property in Kings Park, which was leased to third parties for use primarily as a bus yard and trucking station. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:44 am
The trial judge ordered a reduction of the past pain and suffering award to $600,000 and then, in Morales v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
The trial judge reduced the award to $1,800,000 ($600,000 past, $1,200,000 future) and in Petit v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 6:56 am
Crossman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 4:01 am
King ("King" or the "Plaintiff"), a musician, and his lawyer, defendant Lawrence A. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The 2nd Circuit opinion in Kirtsaeng relied heavily on Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:15 am
Home Builders Ass'n of Tulare/Kings Counties v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 10:12 pm
Almquist et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:21 am
From constitutional law scholar Michael Dorf (Cornell)--clear, accessible to a non-lawyer, and right on the mark throughout in my view. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 10:48 pm
Significant costs, and much valuable court time, is taken up re-arguing identical points of principle in costs litigation due to the absence of a binding authority. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
King; Judge E. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In Chisholm v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
Until the King is advised by the Forfeiture Committee and acts on its advice, Ms Vennells will continue to hold her CBE”. [read post]