Search for: "Law v. State" Results 1541 - 1560 of 156,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
There are no mandatory data retention laws in the United States of America. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:51 am
Regina v Chargot and Others House of Lords “In criminal proceedings against an employer after an accident ot work, it was sufficient for the prosecution to prove merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work, without identifying and proving specific breaches of duty by the employer. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
Chamber of Commerce and other business groups failed in lower courts to get that law overturned as a violation of federal law on alien workers, and last July appealed to the Supreme Court (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:11 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is argued in a Northern District, Dallas Division case styled, Curtis v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:44 am by Amy Howe
The first opinion this morning came in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by NATASHA NGUYEN
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:34 am by JanNovak
From: Alana Jochum, Editor-in-Chief, Cleveland State Law Review: The Cleveland State Law Review is making history as the Supreme Court hears arguments in the Second Amendment rights case of McDonald v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 5:12 am by Chip Merlin
Meanwhile, State Farm has been busy suppressing the methods it uses to adjust water loss claims in Tong v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:01 am by sally
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) (No 2) v Secretary Of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 39 “A stated intention by the Government to abolish regional strategies and to promote legislation for that purpose was capable in law of constituting, for the purposes of section 70(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, a ‘material consideration’ to which planning authorities could have taken regard in making… [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]