Search for: "Law v. State" Results 1541 - 1560 of 156,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
The post Louisiana judge temporarily blocks state’s abortion ban trigger laws appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:51 am
Regina v Chargot and Others House of Lords “In criminal proceedings against an employer after an accident ot work, it was sufficient for the prosecution to prove merely a risk of injury arising from a state of affairs at work, without identifying and proving specific breaches of duty by the employer. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
Chamber of Commerce and other business groups failed in lower courts to get that law overturned as a violation of federal law on alien workers, and last July appealed to the Supreme Court (Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm by Ryan Scoville
This case drew a lot of attention from people who care about U.S. foreign relations law because Bond’s second argument asked the Court to overrule Missouri v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 3:28 am by Howard Wasserman
The state -- the private defendant argues that the state tort law is unconstitutional, and the court on appeal rules that the tort law is unconstitutional, okay? [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
There are no mandatory data retention laws in the United States of America. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm by Zachary Spilman
In my preview of Tuesday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:11 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is argued in a Northern District, Dallas Division case styled, Curtis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by NATASHA NGUYEN
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:34 am by JanNovak
From: Alana Jochum, Editor-in-Chief, Cleveland State Law Review: The Cleveland State Law Review is making history as the Supreme Court hears arguments in the Second Amendment rights case of McDonald v. [read post]