Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Cotton & Ors, R (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWHC 3437 (Admin) This was the Liberty backed judicial review of the bedroom tax regulations on the basis that the regulations amounted to an article 8 breach, or an article 14 breach read with article 8, or that the regulations were irrational. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The trial in TLT and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department began on Monday 20 June 2016 and was completed on 23 June, with judgment being given on 24 June 2016. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
As Lord Diplock put it in Attorney General v Leveller Magazine Limited [1979] AC 440 at 450A to C. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
But it's also a reminder to not expect too much of United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:19 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm
The review letter stated that another offer of accommodation would be made. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Lord Justice Neuberger (as he then was) commented that "it is not entirely easy to justify this" (Akici v LR Butlin [2005] EWCA Civ 1296). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Lord Justice Neuberger (as he then was) commented that "it is not entirely easy to justify this" (Akici v LR Butlin [2005] EWCA Civ 1296). [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 3:15 pm
I was scanning the Court of Appeal judgments, waiting for White v Knowsley, when this came up: London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Ansell [2007] EWCA Civ 326 Now that is interesting. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
Dissenting on this issue, Lord Carnwath would have allowed the defence of counterm [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
Foskett J observed that no feature of the Strasbourg jurisprudence has gone so far as to impose the kind of obligation contended for in this case and that it is not open to the domestic courts to move ahead of the European Court of Human Rights in this regard (invoking the principle in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323), a principle which has found further expression in Regina (Al-Skeini and others) v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153… [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
The inventor's views and corresponding documents may be used to try and define claim scope, obviousness, novelty, and the state of the art. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am
Lord Briggs and Lord Hamblen gave the judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:55 am
Judge Kevin Aalto identified five factors to be looked at:- the plaintiff must have a bona fide case- another party must have information pertinent to the case (eg personal details of subscribers)- a court order is the only reasonable way of obtaining this information- that fairness requires the information to be provided before thr trial- any order will not cause undue delay, inconvenience or expense to the third party or othersThere is also a comprehensive review of Canadian case law;… [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
Put differently, an inventive step (a necessary component for being able to patent something) cannot include something that is 'obvious' to a person skilled in the art, having considered anything that forms the state of the art in which they are skilled in.Typically the courts follow two tests on determining obviousness; (i) the Windsurfing/Pozzolli structure; and (ii) the EPO's problem-and-solution method.The question of obviousness, as set out in Conor Medsystems Inc… [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
Put differently, an inventive step (a necessary component for being able to patent something) cannot include something that is 'obvious' to a person skilled in the art, having considered anything that forms the state of the art in which they are skilled in.Typically the courts follow two tests on determining obviousness; (i) the Windsurfing/Pozzolli structure; and (ii) the EPO's problem-and-solution method.The question of obviousness, as set out in Conor Medsystems Inc… [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm
DA & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2017) EWHC 1446 (Admin) This was the judicial review of the ‘reduced’ benefit cap – £20,000 pa outside London, £23,000 in London, brought by claimants who were all single mothers with children, including children under two years old. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
He said that his hand were tied as The scope of the Convention jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 1 has been addressed by the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Bankovic, and by the House of Lords and the Supreme Court respectively in Al-Skeini and Smith v Oxfordshire. [read post]
