Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm
For instance, Lord Goff, known for his expertise in unjust enrichment, significantly contributed to the principle of forum non conveniens, delivering the leading judgment in the seminal case of Spiliada Maritime Corp v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
R (Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 5 Dec 2017. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 4:51 am
Thus, Lord Bingham of Cornhill has explained in R v Jones (Margaret) [2006] UKHL 16, [2006] 2 WLR 772, at para. 30, in a passage that could have been tailored to the present case:'Resolution of the charge would (...) call for a decision on the culpability in going to war either of Her Majesty's Government or a foreign government, or perhaps both if the states had gone to war as allies. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
(Indeed, in Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:13 am
Earlier this week, a panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Arizona v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
At [34] the CA stated the general rule in future. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
In defining that test, the Supreme Court in Joseph relied heavily on the decision of the House of Lords of Kemsley v Foot [1952] A.C. 345. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 pm
Clause 3.2 stated they they would not publish, in any jurisdiction, any articles or statements which “refer to” Mr Mionis or his “immediate family”. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:48 am
Justice V. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
Malcolm is headed to the Lords and frankly, I don’t think anyone expects the Lords to leave it alone, so there is no doubt more to come. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
Indeed, Lord Justice Ackner referred to the case of R v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:06 am
Lord Stephens, who gave the leading judgment (with which all members of the court agreed), considered the following: Ground 1: This argument was dismissed and Bilta was correctly applied to this case. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 CA and DC: Lord Judge CJ, David Clarke, Lloyd Jones JJ: 29 June 2010 – read judgment A new High Court decision has struck a blow for legal certainty and enforced the sometimes forgotten right under human rights law against retrospective criminal sanctions, which applies even in cases where the UK had failed to enact European… [read post]
