Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R" Results 1541 - 1560 of 1,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: EU Commission adopts proposal to extend copyright protection to performing artists from 50 to 95 years: (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Patry Copyright Blog), (IPEG), (Techdirt), (Techdirt),  ‘Triway’ USPTO, EPO, JPO patent work-sharing pilot starts 28 July: (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (EPO),… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:00 am
By Danny Friedmann Hong Kong has been part of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since 1997. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The Trump administration took the matter to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Ninth Circuit got it wrong. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
See for example, “The Federal Business Record Provision: Section 30 of the Canada Evidence Act,” at p. 82, and generally, pp. 44-119 in, J. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am by Paul Maharg
Latterly, regulators came to adopt various forms of outcomes-based regulation – which were defeasible, but still flawed. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
Haddon set a hearing for March 29 at 11 a.m. in Great Falls to determine what should be done about the matter. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
E.L., the Court held that Alabama could not refuse full faith and credit to a lesbian co-parent adoption from Georgia, under the exacting form of full faith and credit granted to judicial decrees. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
“If allowed to stand, the injunction would encourage courts to use vague public nuisance standards to scuttle the nation’s carefully created system for accommodating the need for energy production and the need for clean air,” appeals court Judge J. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
” The fundamental problem with not adopting “targeting analysis” is the fact that the internet is ubiquitous. [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
These defenses were written into the text of the Equal Pay Act when it was adopted and applied to Title VII pay claims later through something called the Bennett Amendment.The most troubling affirmative defense is based on an employer’s claim that the proven pay disparity is due to “a factor other than sex. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
  Jefferson County School District R-1 v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:25 am
Date 01/24/2007 Governor's Program Governor Program # 1 Chapter Signed Date Effective Date1  01/24/2007      01/24/2007First Act: 01/18/07 referred to ways and meansLast Act: 01/24/07 signed chap.1A3736A Silver (MS) -- Public employee ethics reform; repealer Same as S 2876 SUMM : Amd S94, Exec L; amd S107, Civ Serv L; rpld S1-c sub (j), rpld & add SS 1-l, 1-m & 1-o,… [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
In this examination appeal, the Board held - deviating from T 1265/10 - that regardless of whether or not the EPO would have access to sufficient the funds of the party intending to pay, such an intention can never be considered equivalent to an order.Referring to R 18/13, the Board further found that - different from a mistake made by an assistant - the mistake made by the representative to not explicitly instruct his assistant to pay the appeal fee and to not properly review the… [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
In this examination appeal, the Board held - deviating from T 1265/10 - that regardless of whether or not the EPO would have access to sufficient the funds of the party intending to pay, such an intention can never be considered equivalent to an order.Referring to R 18/13, the Board further found that - different from a mistake made by an assistant - the mistake made by the representative to not explicitly instruct his assistant to pay the appeal fee and to not properly review the… [read post]