Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 5,342
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2018, 11:05 pm
B. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 12:32 pm
Returning to the example above, there is only one offense being charged: “felony larceny pursuant to G.S. 14-72.6(b). [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Even though the regulation in question was directed at vehicle manufacturers, not biofuel manufacturers, Kavanaugh (joined by Tatel and Judge Cornelia Pillard) found standing: If the Government prohibits or impedes Company A from using Company B’s product, does Company B have standing to sue? [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
Editor’s note: Over the next week, Lawfare will be running a series of essays on federalist governance in the Middle East. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
If you just want the copy, it might not matter. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
What normally happens when well funded P faces poorly funded D is that the lawsuit quickly ends b/c D can’t afford to fight. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
GOLDEN, fka TASHANNA B PEARSON, Chapter 7, Debtor.TASHANNA B. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm
[But why does that mean it should matter to the fair use analysis?] [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
In particular, Jeffrey P. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:32 am
B. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
” Section 30-14-402(2)(b)(i), MCA. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
In California (and for that matter, throughout the United States), FDNS officers always appear unannounced at businesses and demand that employers provide them with access to nonpublic worksite areas and access to specific employees, while proffering nothing more “official” than the enforcement agent’s business card. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
In California (and for that matter, throughout the United States), FDNS officers always appear unannounced at businesses and demand that employers provide them with access to nonpublic worksite areas and access to specific employees, while proffering nothing more “official” than the enforcement agent’s business card. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:23 am
"[B]ecause [counsel] did not represent [plaintiff] in that prior matter, there is no way that he could have had access to relevant privileged information belonging to [plaintiff], which is the third requirement of the test. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 8:10 am
., 167 Mont. 519, 523, 540 P.2d 962, 965 (1975). [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
"4 The Court explained that “It is well established that "an arbitrator has broad discretion to determine a dispute and fix a remedy and that any contractual limitation on that discretion must be contained, either explicitly or incorporated by reference, in the arbitration clause itself'," citing Matter of State of New York [Dept. of Correctional Servs. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 6:28 pm
There is nothing in s. 2(b) that guarantees, or elevates to constitutional status, the number of members on a municipal council relative to the number of electors: Reference re Electoral Boundaries Commission Act (Saskatchewan), 1991 CanLII 61 (SCC), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 158 at p. 184, 5 C.R.R. (2d) 1 at p. 10. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 2:40 pm
P. 50(b). [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 10:36 am
P. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
As a more fundamental matter, too, we cannot agree with the dissent's choice to cast aside Southern cases. [read post]
