Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 70,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2020, 1:02 pm
At issue in this case is whether a police officer has reasonable suspicion to stop a motorist for a … Continue reading → The post Oral Argument Preview: Where Do We Draw the Line: Does Driving On, But Not Across, a Marked Line Provide Reasonable Suspicion To Support a Traffic Stop? [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
* To be continued...In this InternKat's opinion, many reportages have overestimated the (positive) significance of this case. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
Courts must consider the following factors when determining whether a likelihood of confusion exists with respect to the use of a trade mark: distinctiveness of the mark alleged to have been infringed; Continue reading → The post FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: DETERMINING THE LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION IN TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT CASES appeared first on Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 12:00 pm
For a free consultation on markup questions, or any securities related question, call Mark at 212-509-6544 or email him at mja@sallahlaw.com [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 8:14 am
Case date: 02 February 2022 Case number: No. 21-1496 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:52 pm
" suggests rather than questions because he does not use a question mark. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:43 am
” The case is New YorkPizzeria, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:12 am
The post Amazon wins landmark trademark law case over perfumes sold by third parties appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:26 am
Applicant's citation of several district court infringement cases was also irrelevant, because there the focus in a civil action the court focuses on actual usage of the marks, unlike this TTAB proceeding.Applicant further contended that he intends to use his mark to promote the City of Boston, and to raise funds "to help the city of Boston. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Litigation relating to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) insider trading case against Mark Cuban (“Cuban”) continues. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:26 pm
Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:11 am
In any case, the Board pointed out once again that each case must be decided on its own merits.Applicant insisted that its slogan is set apart from other text on its specimen of use, but the Board noted that there was no evidence regarding the perceptions of applicant's clients. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:13 am
This principle was established in the MATRATZEN case where the word MATRATZEN, which means ‘mattress’ in Germany, was successfully registered in Spain as a trade mark for beds. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 3:36 pm
There were three cases out of the Federal Court in December 2006 that are of interest. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
It is an established principle in EU trade mark case law that any assessment shall duly consider actuality [actual confusion, actual technical function, actual use -- and that’s all, actually]. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:37 pm
"The cornerstones of the trade mark reform are:How much is being saved? [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 4:30 pm
The second case concerns a brand new referral from the BGH to the CJEU concerning the interpretation of Article 8(3)(e) Enforcement Directive (Right of Information) in cases of trade mark infringement (see Article 19(2) No.3 German Trade Mark Act. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:07 am
Apple and Swatch have engaged in many a trade mark dispute (for example, see my previous article regarding the appeal of Swatch’s ‘ONE MORE THING’ trade mark application in the England and Wales High Court), and the present case inevitably brings to mind previous clashes between Apple’s ‘Think Different’ trade mark and Swatch’s ‘Tick Different’. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
’s application to register the mark APPLE MUSIC. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
” It seems less likely that the case will generate a clear and ringing statement of First Amendment principles. [read post]
