Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 19,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
[IPKat comment: 2 huge problems with this - (1) all these factors go towards showing that there's a link between the marks, but they don't really show that the link has 'rubbed off' on the later mark to give its owner an unfair advantage; (2) these are the factors that were used in relation to detriment to distinctive character, but the court has just said that these are two different types of harm; (3) the ECJ in Intel v CPM said such factors are… [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:42 am
A-1 Pavement Marking, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:18 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
(Mark L., 34 Cal.3d 171.) [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:13 am
A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm
The oral argument transcript in Maples v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 8:01 pm
Stonite Products Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:29 am
In AltaVista Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
The application sought to repress the unauthorized use of Banksy's registered trade marks and reproductions of his/her artworks in the context of an art exhibition in Milan.The text of the decision in RG 52442/2018 Pest Control Office Limited v 24 Ore Cultura s.r.l. is available here.Let's see what happened.BackgroundThe applicant, Pest Control Office, is responsible for issuing certificates of authenticity re Banksy's artworks, and for selling his artworks and… [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:59 am
The form states: "If the asserted mark is not the subject of a U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
(v) Whether the user of the mark or trade name intended to create an association with the famous mark. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am
Mark Hertsgaard has a piece in the Guardian examining US TV news lack of commentary on climate change stating- “its media malpractice not to mention that burning fossil fuels drives extreme weather events like Hurricane Ida”. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 2:45 am
Crombie, et al. marked a victory for states in their battle with the automotive industry, seeking imposition of new rules to reduce tailpipe emissions. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
In Freeman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
FM Approvals, LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:13 am
Coach Services v. [read post]
