Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 1541 - 1560 of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
March 2 marks the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Gibbons v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:10 pm by DMLP Staff
In that context, the court found that the tweet could not reasonably be understood to state actual facts about Feld's mental state. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:10 pm by DMLP Staff
In that context, the court found that the tweet could not reasonably be understood to state actual facts about Feld's mental state. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am
Roe v Wade established the abortion right as against state criminal prohibitions (1973), followed by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am by Christine Corcos
Roe v Wade established the abortion right as against state criminal prohibitions (1973), followed by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Eleonora Rosati
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc.).In delivering its new judgment in the long-running (15+ years and counting!) [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:43 am
Until February 2013, the eBay listings stated that the Daisy Charm links "fit[s] Nomination". [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:02 pm
Delta Sport's logoThe General Court of the EU ('the Court') recently (13 February 2020) issued its judgment in Case T-387/18 Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:07 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Nancy Welsh (nxw10@DSL.PSU.EDU) of Penn State, Dickinson School of Law has announced the following conference:On Friday, March 26, 2010, Penn State will hold a symposium addressingthe Supreme Court's recent decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]