Search for: "Matter of Jones v Jones" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2024, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“‘Successive motions for summary judgment should not be entertained without a showing of newly discovered evidence or other sufficient justification”‘ (Maggio v 24 W 57 APF, LLC, 134 AD3d 621, 625 [1st Dept 2015], quoting Jones v 636 Holding Corp., 73 AD3d 409,409 [1st Dept 2010]; see also Pough v Aegis Prop. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[28]  Because the twins fit into these portions of ICWA, the issues for determination by the Court were whether the state law definition of “domicile” should control, and whether under the ICWA definition of “domicile” the twins were non-domiciliaries on the reservation.[29]  The Supreme Court recognized that the language of ICWA does not define “domicile;” and that the definition is a matter of Congressional intent.[30]  The Court… [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Rockwell International v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:35 am by Amy Howe
Jones also pointed to NCMEC’s actions being a search. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:24 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford Last week the Fifth Circuit rendered a fascinating decision in McGee v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:39 am
The recent cases of World Wise Partners Ltd v RBTT (2008) and Smith v NCB (2008) were cited as examples. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm by Caroline Mala Corbin
Yet they overlook the Supreme Court’s most recent church property case, Jones v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
  New Relists Republic of Sudan v. [read post]