Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1541 - 1560
of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
[T]he one showed in the application is not mine. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:40 pm
There are multiple problems with this theory - the amount of time it takes for consumers to sort out uncertainty is a few hundred milliseconds, and it's not clear that really matters. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:03 pm
I can't. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:31 pm
However, it is obvious that the EU instances cannot be required to hold a trial in trade mark matters against (deceased) people in order to find out whether they are innocent or not. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 3:25 am
The degree of similarity is a matter of law which must be assessed ex officio by the Office (Calvo, T-53/05), and is restricted to well-known facts (i.e "facts which are likely to be known by anyone or which may be learned from generally accessible sources", which excludes facts of a highly technical nature (Alpharen, T-106/12)). [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 2:07 pm
Defense attorneys for Facebook and founder Mark Zuckerberg won’t oppose attorney Dean Boland’s motion to withdraw from representing plaintiff Paul Ceglia, as long as he can’t have his cake and eat it too, according to a new federal court filing (read it below). [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 6:12 am
Mark Pohl of Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys LLC can’t represent HP Ingredients Corp. in its infringement litigation against Sabinsa Corp. over the name for a competing anti-inflammation extract. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:08 am
” “No matter the specific number of firms, this marks a major shift in the legal field. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 11:05 am
When Your Trademark is Not Federally Registered A competitor can’t copy your trademark just because you didn’t register it. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
I don't think that matters. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:02 pm
appeared first on The Law Offices of Mark Sherman. [read post]
21 May 2013, 6:45 am
The Evolution 3GS mark was incontestable, giving it “presumptive[]” strength (ugh again—no, incontestability means irrebuttable nondescriptiveness: as a matter of law, if it’s not generic, it functions as a mark, but that doesn’t make it a strong mark, so that’s wrong in two distinct ways). [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 5:45 pm
"Exclusive" and "proprietary" may indicate a claim of right to preclude others from offering the same technology, but it doesn't matter who invented that technology. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
[T]he following threshold conditions ... must be satisfied before a website blocking order is made. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 10:23 am
This may not have been Conroy's intention (I rather think it wasn't) but the senator must face the consequences of his actions. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
A spokesperson for PayPal commented only that “we have resolved this matter amicably. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm
But does the standard of patent validity actually matter? [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 am
Where a trademark is located matters. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
[The Morehouse defense seems to be available only when you don't really need it: i.e., when you already have a registration for virtually the same mark and goods. [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:57 pm
I think this matter is obviously a bit more complex that Simon’s article presented it. [read post]
