Search for: "Mays v. Paul" Results 1541 - 1560 of 7,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2013, 9:53 am by Buce
It has many merits and some provokes a few unevadable reservation—reservations which I may or may not get to in this post. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, the Appellate Division observed that whether a provision in a collective bargaining agreement "is ambiguous is a question of law and extrinsic evidence may not be considered unless the document itself is ambiguous. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, the Appellate Division observed that whether a provision in a collective bargaining agreement "is ambiguous is a question of law and extrinsic evidence may not be considered unless the document itself is ambiguous. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am by Laura Sandwell
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R v Waya, heard 5 May 2011. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:54 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.November 4, 2009 - 2 PM: Teletech, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 7:50 pm
Lundin and by Magistrate Judge Paul Grimm in Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:12 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The parties’ briefs to the Commission are due by May 10, 2010, with reply submissions due by May 17, 2010. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:24 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
Mayo may now be tempered by the specter of the Supreme Court adopting the argument that Justice Stephen Breyer (joined by now-retired Justices John Paul Stephens and David Souter) made in his vigorous dissent to the dismissal of the writ of certiorari of a kindred case, Laboratory Corporation v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:22 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
Mayo may now be tempered by the specter of the Supreme Court adopting the argument that Justice Stephen Breyer (joined by now-retired Justices John Paul Stephens and David Souter) made in his vigorous dissent to the dismissal of the writ of certiorari of a kindred case, Laboratory Corporation v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a recent non-precedential decision in the case of Adams v. [read post]