Search for: "Mitchell v. State" Results 1541 - 1560 of 1,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 11:00 am by Christopher Sagers
  Both cases also involved the quite rare interlocutory review of denial of motions to dismiss—such review is almost never granted except where defendant claims some special immunity from suit [Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
The AmeriKat passed out on all of herco-existence agreements...A mammoth decision from Mr Justice Norris plopped on the AmeriKat's desk last week in the long-running awaited trade mark co-existence saga of Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme [2016] EWHC 49 (Pat). [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Crown attempted to rely on Justice Binnie’s holding in Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:58 am by Alfred Brophy
 Justice Harris' viciously proslavery opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 10:20 am by Jeremy M. Klang
One of our business attorneys at Schober Schober & Mitchell, S.C. would be happy to help. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 10:20 am by Jeremy M. Klang
One of our business attorneys at Schober Schober & Mitchell, S.C. would be happy to help. [read post]