Search for: "Montana State Supreme Court" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2012, 5:22 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court decision reversed a lower court ruling certifying the national class action lawsuit Dukes v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Free Speech for People et al.Amicus brief of Citizens UnitedAmicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of AmericaAmicus brief of Senator Mitch McConnell Amicus brief of Former Officials of the American Civil Liberties Union in support of neither partyAmicus brief of Retired Montana Supreme Court Justices Amicus brief of United States Representatives Robert Brady et al.Amicus brief… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am by Joshua Matz
Bullock, the Montana campaign finance case. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm by Rick Hasen
  Here’s a description Free Speech and Government Corruption (12:00PM) The US Supreme Court has ordered Montana to abolish historic limits on campaign contributions to comply with its 2010 Citizens United decision. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:39 pm by National Indian Law Library
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/currentsct.htmlPetition for certiorari was filed in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm
MARCIA COYLE: The court on June 14 is going to take its first look at an appeal, a petition that's been filed by three corporations who are challenging the Montana Supreme Court's decision that its law banning corporate independent expenditures survives, despite the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:48 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0030, 2012 MT 120, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am by Marissa Miller
FEC,” while in an op-ed for the New York Times, Montana governor Brian Schweitzer explains the case from the state’s perspective. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by Lovechilde
Last year the Montana Supreme Court upheld its longtime Corrupt Practices Act, a tough regulation of corporate financing of its elections. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
It is part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (so-called “Obamacare”), and California insurance attorneys and politicians are waiting to see what the Supreme Court decides on its constitutionality. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
It is part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (so-called “Obamacare”), and California insurance attorneys and politicians are waiting to see what the Supreme Court decides on its constitutionality. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:43 pm by News
Montana corporate lawyers argued this was a “’…’diversion’ from the central question of whether the Montana Supreme Court had disobeyed the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling by upholding a state law that is said to conflict directly with that decision. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
When cases go in different directions in the federal courts, the Supreme Court is most primed to sort things out. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:49 am by Rick Hasen
George Will: “Montana uses an interesting argument to justify defiance of a Supreme Court decision: Because the state is particularly prone to political corruption, it should be trusted to constrict First Amendment protections of political speech.” [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:24 am by Cormac Early
Bullock, the challenge to the Montana Supreme Court ruling upholding a statute that bans corporate spending in state elections, arguing that “[r]easons for the Supreme Court to reconsider Citizens United are nonexistent.”  And writing for Roll Call, Eliza Newlin Carney suggests that efforts by opponents of Citizens United to seek reconsideration of that decision are a “risky… [read post]