Search for: "Murphy v. Murphy"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
In the court below (6 F4th 1160 (10th Cir, 2021)), the majority of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Briscoe J, Murphy J concurring; Tymkovich CJ dissenting) held that, although the appellant’s First Amendment rights were engaged, the State satisfied strict scrutiny: Colorado had a compelling interest in ensuring equal access to publicly available goods and services, and no option short of coercing speech could satisfy that interest. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
But Judge Amul Thapar—joined by Judges Nalbandian, Murphy and Readler—concurred. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
But Judge Amul Thapar—joined by Judges Nalbandian, Murphy and Readler—concurred. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:06 pm
MURPHY, J.S.C.The defendant, Daniel Machuzak, was convicted in the Municipal Court, Montgomery Township, for driving while intoxicated in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
Habitual drunkenness for the space of two years In Murphy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
Couden v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 8:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
Judge Murphy got reversed on a downward departure in Berry v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 8:32 am
Murphy (1979) 8 Cal.3d 359.) [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:12 am
Murphy v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:43 am
However, where, as here, an argument presents an issue of law appearing on the face of the record which could not have been avoided if raised at the proper juncture, it may be considered by an appellate court (see Parry v Murphy, 79 AD3d 713; Verde Elec. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:47 am
However, where, as here, an argument presents an issue of law appearing on the face of the record which could not have been avoided if raised at the proper juncture, it may be considered by an appellate court (see Parry v Murphy, 79 AD3d 713; Verde Elec. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:34 am
¶20 (quoting Rhue v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
Murphy with Mr. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
But Tuesday’s case, Ramirez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:31 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff V. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:33 am
Murphy Oil USA, Inc., No. 1:05-CV-00436LG (S.D. [read post]
