Search for: "Office of Hearing and Appeals" Results 1541 - 1560 of 23,879
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”The briefs submitted in the Glossip case all suggest that it would be “unthinkable,” to borrow Drummond’s word, for the Supreme Court to allow his execution to go forward when Oklahoma’s chief law enforcement officer “has already confessed error. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Fifth, Scalia objected that the opinion left open the question whether a state court could compel the President's attendance at a hearing: I am glad that the opinion makes clear (at page 9) that we are not addressing the question whether a court may compel the attendance of the President at any specific time or place. [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:15 am by Alec Pronk
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal testified during a hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, Centripetal Networks filed a reply in support of its petition for a writ of mandamus in its patent dispute with Cisco. [read post]
3 May 2023, 10:15 am by Alec Pronk
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal testified during a hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, Centripetal Networks filed a reply in support of its petition for a writ of mandamus in its patent dispute with Cisco. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:10 am by Phil Dixon
The South Carolina Attorney General appealed, asserting various arguments for reversal. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
On Wednesday 3rdand Thursday 4th May the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Imam) v London Borough of Croydon, on appeal from [2022] EWCA Civ 601. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:58 pm by Stewart Baker
The appeal court left in place fines of $200 thousand a day for noncompliance. [read post]
1 May 2023, 11:20 am by Giles Peaker
During the all day hearing listed on Wednesday, 29 March 2023, Judge Moloney heard the appeal and delivered judgment finding that the appeal is allowed on Grounds 1, 2 and 3. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:42 am by cordiscosaistg
” Specific loss benefits compensate injured workers for certain permanent injuries, including the following: Partial or complete loss of the use of limbs and appendages Partial or complete loss of sight or hearing Permanent visible disfigurement According to the University of Utah Health, people with brain injuries may experience the following, which may qualify for a specific loss award: Changes in vision Paralysis Balance problems Cognitive impairments You may qualify for… [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
OpenDemocracy has appealed the decision. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:20 am by Juan C. Antúnez
The same evidence that authorizes a probate judge to remove a personal representative nominated in your will from office, could get her reversed on appeal for refusing to appoint this same person as personal representative at the outset. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 12:32 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
Not even the provider of the E2EE service can read or hear its users’ conversations. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which has scheduled oral arguments in the case for next month. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:10 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) demonstrated some confusion on the part of Congress about the intent of USPTO Director Kathi Vidal’s recent Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on changes to Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) processes, and suggested the Subcommittee members believe she may be exceeding her authority. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:10 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) demonstrated some confusion on the part of Congress about the intent of USPTO Director Kathi Vidal’s recent Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on changes to Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) processes, and suggested the Subcommittee members believe she may be exceeding her authority. [read post]