Search for: "Paul Branch " Results 1541 - 1560 of 1,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
One proposal—put forward most forcefully by Duke Law Professor Paul Carrington and the late Cornell Law School Dean Roger Cramton—would fix a Justice’s term at 18 years. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:45 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Many of these lawyers and their law firms have been attacked by leaders in the other two branches of our government. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:00 am by familoo
  Sir Paul Coleridge told the charity Care it was concerned only with procedure and not with principle; “The law in this field is in desperate need of comprehensive, root and branch overhaul after prospective - i.e. forward looking – review of family policy by a non political grouping. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:37 am
(In those jurisdictions where the jury’s power to nullify is recognized in the constitution or otherwise clearly established, an explicit and reform-minded scheme of nullification — such as Paul Butler’s proposal to remedy the racial impact of our drug laws — could count as uncivil obedience.) [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As a theoretical matter, does co-regulation have to come from the executive/legislative branches? [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  By a vote of 8-0, with Justice William Brennan writing the opinion and Justice John Paul Stevens not participating, the Court upheld California's law as not pre-empting the Federal law of immigration. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:54 am by Marvin Ammori
 Jack Goldsmith reaches the same conclusion:It is also important to remember, to paraphrase Justice Stewart in the Pentagon Papers, that the responsibility for these disclosures lies firmly with the institution empowered to keep them secret: the Executive branch.This is not to blame the Executive branch; it is just to emphasize that securing information is the usual remedy to balance transparency, necessary secrecy, and a free press. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The White House this week received a list of possible judges that was drawn up by the Federalist Society, and a coalition of Koch Brothers-financed groups has put together a list of Cabinet picks composed entirely of right-wing ideologues who are on the public record as saying that they favor deregulation and even the shuttering of the agencies that they would be appointed to run.This is especially worrisome because the Executive Branch has been hobbled throughout Clinton’s presidency… [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Trump administration’s progress on filling vacancies in the executive branch arguably has been slow, and one can only assume that it could be some time before the administration moves on to filling the federal district court vacancies. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Oklahoma – Step Up Campaign Highlights Gap in State Disclosure LawsAda News – Paul Monies and Trevor Browen (Oklahoma Watch) | Published: 2/25/2018 The plan by Step Up Oklahoma to raise taxes on cigarettes, fuel, and energy failed to pass, but it highlighted a gap in state law that keeps much of the funding and spending on both sides of the issue a secret. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
On your political science chart, draw an arrow shifting power away from administrative agencies under Article II of the Constitution towards the judicial branch under Article III.Two other cases this term, Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:08 am by Jim Sedor
But attorney Paul Avelar of the Institute for Justice said he reads the ruling to apply to all the independent groups pushing to elect or defeat candidates. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
Four other justices – Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer – disagreed; they would have allowed courts to review partisan-gerrymandering claims. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
Four other justices – Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer – disagreed; they would have allowed courts to review partisan-gerrymandering claims. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:08 am by Joe May
Federal: Mitch McConnell’s Triumph Strikes Worry in the Hearts of Campaign Finance Reformers Huffington Post – Paul Blumenthal | Published: 11/8/2014 The U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
All of this activity, however, has taken place in the political branches. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
MSN – Deanna Paul (Washington Post) | Published: 3/20/2019 U.S. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:19 pm
  Isn't it the prerogative of the administration to realign the mission of executive branch agencies to comport with the electoral mandate? [read post]