Search for: "People v Goode" Results 1541 - 1560 of 19,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2008, 12:30 am
The good people at the Open Rights Group forwarded me an email they received from a Doctor Who fan that goes by the screen name Mazzmatazz, who has allowed me to tell his/her story. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 10:32 pm
In a lengthy opinion, the Court of Appeals in People v Kozlowski, 2008 NY Slip Op 07759 [10/16/08], upheld the larceny (and related) convictions of the former CEO Kozlowski and CFO Swartz of Tyco and the fines of $35 and $70 million imposed on Swartz and Kozlowski, respectively. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:41 am by Russ Bensing
Not that that’s going to do Angela Moulton any good. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm by Paul Horwitz
 The subject has been much on my mind in the last two or three days while reading and commenting on Town of Greece v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by NATASHA NGUYEN
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
Taney didn't do it, but, if one can accept Story's similarly-motivated opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:01 am by J
I have been provided with a note of judgment and so can give you a bit more detail.Imagine, if you will, that a large number of the good people of North London are, to put it mildly, somewhat dissatisfied with the Tory/Lib Dem cuts to public expenditure (a view, I should add, which is plainly shared by all right-thinking people). [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 12:21 pm by Mark Rumold
While that’s good for the privacy of those unwittingly swept up in the program, it's bad news for criminal defendants. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:56 am by Eric Goldman
Pornhub * Catching Up on Recent FOSTA Developments (None of Them Good) * Section 230 Preempts Claims [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]