Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am
Others are more sinister, like when former senior Ulster Unionist Lord Kilclooney described the Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar as ‘the Indian’. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:04 pm
The Chair of Committee is John Whittingdale MP and its membership comprises 13 MPs and 13 Lords. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:10 pm
Perhaps by further legal clarification he is referring to the Supreme Court’s impending judgment in the Catt v ACPO case? [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
The second most important protection for a grand jury witness is the Fifth Amendment.[6] Unfortunately, business people, public officials, professionals and other white-collar types are loath to rely on the Fifth Amendment, concluding – with justification – that most people believe that one who invokes his or her Fifth Amendment rights is guilty of something. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
The novel was not a work of pure fiction, but included real people and information presented as “fact”. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
And allow me to venture a guess or two… you guys at Chase are “overwhelmed” with requests for loan modifications… you’re busy… friends came in unexpectedly from out of town… you just can’t hire people to meet the demand… or wait… I know… Mr. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Back in the High Court, on 7 October 2013 Lord Justice Floyd (as he now was) issued an order that restrained TV Catchup from retransmission via its streaming services without obtaining a licence from the broadcasters (ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5). [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am
It is time – in fact it is overdue - to take stock of the increasingly imminent Online Safety Bill. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm
” In line with Leggatt J, I prefer to try to determine the truth by applying the dissenting speech of Lord Pearce in Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 403, HL: “’Credibility’ involves wider problems than mere ‘demeanour’ which is mostly concerned with whether the witness appears to be telling the truth as he now believes it to be. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:59 am
In Designer’s Guild v Russell Williams, the House of Lords defines substantial as “a matter of impression, for whether the part taken is substantial must be determined by its quality rather than its quantity. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The most recent reference to the law of patents being wholly statutory are the words of Lord Walker in Synthon B.V. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
” Barlow’s letter encapsulated the reasoning behind the idea of copyright as an incentive to promote knowledge: literary and intellectual works took a considerable amount of time and resources to produce, and given the great public benefits that flow from them, some way of encouraging people to devote their time and resources to producing them was needed. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
It’s overly idealistic to act like, Oh, the Internet is the one place where people should be able to do whatever they wish: present child pornography, do scams, libel people, steal copyrighted material. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
The House of Lords found that such practices did interfere with individuals’ right to a private life under Article 8(1) [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The task for the drafter of the code is to make sense of all of this, taking account of the law as it had developed in and after the House of Lords decision in Ahmad v Newham LBC (links to our note), as well as the policy desire since the days of Caroline Flint as housing minister to "reward" those in or seeking employment through allocations priorities. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:01 pm
" Just 46 people were questioned-eight more than the minimum necessary-and only for a few minutes each. [read post]
