Search for: "People v. Davis" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  The “Democracy Now” site has an interview with journalist Nick Davies about the phone hacking story. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Also, the Court has yet to set a Conference for the rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In 1889 SCOTUS defined religion in Davis v Beason, making reference to Madison, as follows: ‘The term “religion” has reference to one's views of his relations to his Creator, and to the obligations they impose of reverence for his being and character, and of obedience to his will’. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 11:35 pm
" In 2001 the Supreme Court of Delaware, in the case of Davis v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Previously, he served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by Rachel Neave
Proponents of this viewpoint also pointed to the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The article is in response to the French data protection regulator CNIL’s recent decision to stop collecting and processing people’s data in France. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 In Henry v Cash Biz the Supremes had another chance to demonstrate their commitment to denying people harmed by shady business practices from getting any relief from the State’s judicial system; they embraced that opportunity wholeheartedly as much as coldheartedly, with not a single member of the court writing in dissent. [read post]