Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 16,977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
At the very least it showed that the court had been perfectly aware of some people's abolitionist hopes and dreams, but declined their invitations to legislate from the bench on an issue it simply didn't have to reach.Four years later history appears to be repeating itself as a result of the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari (i.e., decision to hear the case) in CLS Bank v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:06 pm
Moreover, such a distinction would grant constitutional rights to people who could afford garages but deprive that right to those whose vehicles were stored on their property, next to their homes, in open areas. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:42 pm
The post The Strange Case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:49 am
On November 30, 2010, the Court of Appeals published its opinion in People v Klocek, No. 292993. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
Perhaps this is the reason for the grant? [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:28 am
Two people who are generally sympatico nonetheless going at it in their respective opinions. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 8:00 am
In Arista v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
In CFPB and People of the State of New York v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
In CFPB and People of the State of New York v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:26 am
See Mann v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently granted review in Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:32 am
Colonial legislation affecting Indigenous peoples of southern New England as organized by state. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 2:12 pm
Yazzie et al. v. [read post]
Gang Cases Update – People v. Rodriguez (California Supremes Bring Presents, Not Coal For Christmas)
8 Jan 2013, 9:47 pm
Just one month later, the Fourth Appellate District handed down the case of People v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 9:34 am
" The approving reference to eBay v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Nothing in the First Amendment required Congress to confer Section 230 immunity on speech that violates federal criminal laws in the first place, and nothing in the First Amendment ossifies such immunity once granted against any later clarification. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:13 pm
And I'm glad the Court of Appeal decides to publish it.The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant, but the Court of Appeal reverses. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 12:01 pm
The district court grants summary judgment to the defendants. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 3:59 pm
Further, to admit the results of the Intoxilyzer 5000EN, which is conducted at the precinct, the People must show that the devise was properly calibrated, generally within about a six month period as held in People v Boscic. [read post]
