Search for: "People v. Li"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 2,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2016, 2:29 pm
People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” or “somewhere in between” do not comprise a third sex. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:52 am
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
The source of this specter lies not in anyone's crystal ball but in the history of U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 11:47 am
Krishna Murthi v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 6:48 am
Relying on the votes of five Justices in the Supreme Court's 2012 decision in the first Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Wickard v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
” The most critical substantive portion of CRC 5.111 lies in subsection (b), specifically that “the statements in the declaration must be admissible in evidence. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Whether domain expertise can safeguard against hindsight bias is not entirely clear, experts – specifically judges – are certainly not immune to hindsight bias.[3]Deliberation in groups does not seem to reliably reduce hindsight bias, but the research is limited and restricted to small groups (three people). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
There was a moment when white people listened and learned from the ideas of African American intellectual as we moved towards Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm
For instance, in Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The “conspiracy” part of “seditious conspiracy” can apply to a whole bunch of people. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
., v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am
” People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
X v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
The denial of review in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:32 am
The problem lies in the formulation. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:32 am
On a historical note, the antecedent to this proposal lies in the very old practice of granting one vote per shareholder rather than one vote per share as now is the norm. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:38 pm
— Orin Reading the Fifth Circuit's decision in Netchoice v. [read post]
