Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 1541 - 1560 of 39,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2019, 3:27 pm
  Not three.Ten different Ninth Circuit judges recuse themselves from the en banc call:  Judges McKeown, Wardlaw, Bybee, Bea, Watford, Owens, Friedland, Miller, Collins, and Lee.So it's an opinion that may affect at least a nontrivial number of people in a particular socioeconomic group. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm by Youngjae Lee
It should also be pointed out that the categorical v. case-by-case debate is not some new thing that just occurred to people in 2009. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:52 am
It may not rest on equivocal or "innocuous behavior" that is susceptible of an innocent as well as a culpable interpretation (People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:40 pm by Jonathan Bailey
In this case, the main decision of interest is the Cartoon Network, LP v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:46 am by Duets Guest Blogger
  The post Caribou v Blue Caribou : Doing things right the first time. appeared first on DuetsBlog. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The court noted that there are unusual circumstances in which silence will be admissible (People v Rothschild, 35 NY2d 355 [1974] [defendant police officer had a duty to report to his supervisors if he was taking the bribe money as part of a "sting"]; People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673 [1980] [defendant told police he shot victim during an altercation, properly cross-examined on his failure to make claim that victim was trying to rob him, as he testified at… [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:00 pm
DUI law is actually more complex than most people realize, and the recent case of Coffey v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Human Rights chief Michelle Bachelet has said, adding that many of the violations it is verifying since the Russian invasion may amount to war crimes. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 2:31 pm by Andrew Koppelman
An irresponsible sentence that Justice Samuel Alito wrote eight years ago may now excuse religious people from nearly every legal obligation they have, so long as a hypothetical, nonexistent government program could substitute for it.That became clear this week when Judge Reed O’Connor declared in Braidwood Management v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by SHG
  This was the rule since Marbury v. [read post]