Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm
The court noted that there are unusual circumstances in which silence will be admissible (People v Rothschild, 35 NY2d 355 [1974] [defendant police officer had a duty to report to his supervisors if he was taking the bribe money as part of a "sting"]; People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673 [1980] [defendant told police he shot victim during an altercation, properly cross-examined on his failure to make claim that victim was trying to rob him, as he testified at… [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:39 am
From a New York trial court decision in People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:55 am
Parish v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:48 am
Torres and Maverick v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:13 pm
The theory being that disabled persons may need to park closer (and take more time) than regular drivers. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:16 pm
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:45 pm
As you may recall, Facebook embraced SESTA/FOSTA during the legislative proceedings. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 6:18 pm
This is an issue that most people may not think about during the divorce process. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:19 pm
Crista joined the Ramos v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 9:41 am
Many people therefore assume that the precedent is limited to such conditions. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:32 am
People have some kind of problem with V-necks? [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
” Breyer agreed, pointing to the aftermath of Bush v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:06 pm
Van der Peet, R. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:35 pm
A state may deny access to records available to its citizens pursuant to its Freedom of Information Law to individuals not citizens of that state who make a FOIL request for such records McBurney Et Al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:43 am
In other words, you may apply for both sets of benefits at the same time in some circumstances. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 2:31 pm
An irresponsible sentence that Justice Samuel Alito wrote eight years ago may now excuse religious people from nearly every legal obligation they have, so long as a hypothetical, nonexistent government program could substitute for it.That became clear this week when Judge Reed O’Connor declared in Braidwood Management v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:47 am
by Lee DavisJustice Holder writing for the Court in State of Tennessee v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:47 am
by Lee DavisJustice Holder writing for the Court in State of Tennessee v. [read post]
