Search for: "Petition of Thomas"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 4,010
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, dissented from the denial of review and would have granted the petition. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
He announces that the cert petitions in “Donald J. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:49 am
"AND: "We have action on the travel ban. 'We grant the petitions for certiorari and grant the stay applications in part.'" THE STAY IS GRANTED! [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, disagreed with the Court’s denial of the Peruta case. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
” The Daily Journal’s Weekly Appellate Report podcast features discussions of last week’s personal-jurisdiction decision and a concurrence by Justice Clarence Thomas in a recent decision limiting the ability of post-9/11 detainees to sue federal officials under the Constitution. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
On 26 June 1997, in Reno v ACLU,[1] the US Supreme Court decided the fate of the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”), insofar as it criminalized the intentional transmission of "obscene or indecent" messages or information. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
In Time, Thomas Wolf observes that the court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
The Washington Redskins also petitioned for certiorari while their case was still pending before the Fourth Circuit, but the Supreme Court declined to grant the unusual request to hear the case as a complementary companion to Mr. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
The Washington Redskins also petitioned for certiorari while their case was still pending before the Fourth Circuit, but the Supreme Court declined to grant the unusual request to hear the case as a complementary companion to Mr. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
,” MALDEF President and General Counsel Thomas A. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
In an interesting coincidence, just last week I came across this certiorari petition in the case of Surratt v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
He is joined in full by Roberts and Alito, and for the most part by Thomas. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:31 am
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
” Supreme Court short-lister Judge Thomas Hardiman dissented. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 8:27 am
The three-Justice concurrence, authored by Justice Thomas, would have reached the same conclusion, but on Article III grounds, essentially concluding that with the dismissal of the underlying claim there was no longer a valid case or controversy. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
At Reuters, Alison Frankel reports that a concurrence in the case by Justice Clarence Thomas “shows at least three justices are still thinking about the standing of uninjured class members, just as plaintiffs in a case that raises the issue are about to file a response to a petition for Supreme Court review by Conagra Brands. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 1:44 pm
The plaintiffs petitioned the Ninth Circuit for permission to appeal under Rule 23(f), which was denied. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 1:44 pm
The plaintiffs petitioned the Ninth Circuit for permission to appeal under Rule 23(f), which was denied. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
Justice Thomas, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito issued a concurring opinion, concurring only in the judgment. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:18 am
Thomas McCarthy, MCCARTHY ON TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION § 16:45 (4th ed. 2015). [read post]
