Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 178,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2017, 11:46 am
Even in cases in which the plaintiff ultimately recovers compensation for their injuries after settlement negotiations or a trial, it is likely that the plaintiff had to overcome the issue of government immunity at some point in the lawsuit. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 12:35 pm
Last week, Barbara Billauer, at the American Council on Science and Health[1] website, reported on the Australian court that found insufficient scientific evidence to support plaintiffs’ claims that they had developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) from their exposure to Monsanto’s glyphosate product. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 9:58 pm
"Here's a link for anyone who's interested. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 3:44 am
Here’s VC Glasscock’s original […] [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 2:57 pm
The court’s holding will have a broader effect on future premises liability claims. [read post]
23 May 2020, 3:18 am
Finally, the court pointed out that no evidence was introduced indicating that the accident may have been attributable to the plaintiff’s negligence. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:51 am
If a plaintiff’s notice is insufficient, a court may reject the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:41 pm
But instead, Plaintiffs find themselves back in court. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 4:15 pm
Plaintiffs pose the proper question. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
The district court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for lack of Article III standing. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:09 am
[The expert's] advice and assistance in licensing and asserting Plaintiff’s patents indicate [he] is closely involved with Plaintiff’s competitive business decisions. . . . [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:36 am
The First Circuit rejected plaintiff’s argument that the subsequent purchaser doctrine was inapplicable to mineral rights and applied the Supreme Court’s opinion in Eagle Pipe to bar the Plaintiff’s tort, contract, and Mineral Code claims for alleged contamination of property caused by oil and gas operations that occurred prior to the Plaintiff’s acquisition of the property. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:50 am
Krane LLP/Krane’s cross-motion for summary judgment (mot seq 002) is granted only with respect to plaintiff’s breach-of-contract claims against them, and is otherwise denied. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:48 am
May 13, 2016), the plaintiff owned nearly 40 acres of land, which included his residence as well as some hangars for small planes and a landing strip built by the plaintiff. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:39 am
Supreme Court quashed an interlocutory appeal from a trial court order barring the plaintiff’s counsel from attending parts of his client’s neuropsychological IME or recording the exam. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
George’s [takedown request] knowingly misrepresented that [Plaintiff’s song] was infringing,” and that “Ms. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 1:33 pm
In a July 20, 2017 case, the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland decided whether the lower court correctly dismissed the plaintiff’s case as barred by the statute of limitations. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:06 pm
The Court concluded no sufficient cause was shown to support the Plaintiff’s appeal, and thus affirmed the judgment of the Washington County Superior Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 6:54 am
The Second Circuit rejects plaintiff's argument that a comparable co-worker, Daniel, did not receive a reprimand for various acts of workplace misconduct. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 6:40 pm
Civil Code section 3295, subdivision (c), precludes discovery of the defendant's financial condition unless the plaintiff can establish "a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim" for punitive damages. [read post]
