Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 59,613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2008, 8:39 pm
In a case known as Mapp v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 11:54 am
USMJ's violation of jurisdictional limitations of Rule 41(b) did not warrant suppression of evidence because it is not a constitutional requirement. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 9:34 am
The Supreme Court of India ruled Friday that a forced DNA test violates the right to privacy and personal liberty. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:39 am
Texas Rule of Evidence 404(b) provides that Evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:58 am
Like its federal counterpart, Indiana Rule of Evidence 105 provides that When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the court, upon... [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:22 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 407 provides that When, after an injury or harm allegedly caused by an event, measures are taken that, if taken previously, would have made the injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent... [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:44 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) states: (b) During an Inquiry into the Validity of a Verdict or Indictment. (1) Prohibited Testimony or Other Evidence. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:12 am
Like its federal counterpart, Alaska Rule of Evidence 406 provides that Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is relevant to... [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:08 am
Like its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 105 provides that When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the court, upon... [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 5:05 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 414(a) provides that In a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of an offense of child molestation, evidence of the defendant's commission of another offense or offenses of child molestation is admissible, and may... [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 3:48 am
Pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Evidence 613(b), Extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement by a witness is not admissible unless and until the witness is afforded an opportunity to explain or deny the same and the opposite party is... [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
In the latest chapter of a Luzerne County uninsured motorist (UM) benefits case that has gone up and down the appellate ladder, The Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled in Vanderhoff v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:40 pm
Like its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 803(5) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to enable him... [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:31 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(A) provides that A statement is not hearsay if... [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 7:33 am
In Flood v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
See for example, R. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 7:46 am
In US v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:23 am
Michigan v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
” Second, Kagan accused the majority of “invent[ing] a new rule of evidence” – the submission of an alternative map – “to burden plaintiffs in racial-gerrymandering cases. [read post]
19 May 2007, 4:55 am
May 17, 2007) (not precedential), the Third Circuit ruled that essentially useless evidence from ICE cannot be considered new evidence that requires reopening a case. [read post]
