Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Following Goldsmith was Thomas Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, arguing on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae supporting the petitioners. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 7:58 pm
Using Marbury v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:54 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 1:13 pm
The Supreme Court asked the Solicitor General to file a brief giving the opinion of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 am
Today in a 5-4 decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:25 am
In ONEOK v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:37 pm
United States quotes Justice Felix Frankfurter's classic article, Some Reflections on the Reading of Statutes, 47 Colum. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
The judgment orders the United States to pay money that it would not disburse but for the court’s order. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:40 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia explained in Printz v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:59 am
” At Illinois Public Radio, Verity Winship weighs in on United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm
Professor Lund disputed this, noting that the “pre-existing right” protected by the Second Amendment was the right as it existed in the United States under the common law and state constitutions, not the right as it existed under English law. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:01 am
California and United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am
” In Mother Jones, Pema Levy discusses the case of five American Samoans, who are asking the Court to weigh in on their argument that denying birthright citizenship to residents of that U.S. territory “violates the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of birthright citizenship to ‘[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
Unlike the Altmann v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:59 am
(Orin Kerr) In its opinion below in what became United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
