Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
’” Alexander Bolton of The Hill reports that “Democrats say the prospect that the Senate will confirm a Trump nominee who could overturn the Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail… [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
Globalization has opened holes in the walls that used to serve to police and protect states and their power authority. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has handed down a number of recent rulings: Resolution Statement 0782-18 Wilson v thesun.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 07827-18 Wilson v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation 06605-18 McPartlin and Corbett v Woman, 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 06604-18 McPartlin and Corbett v Now, 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Several men, including Alexander Bickel, died before completing their commissions. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Colacicco, 2008 WL 927848, at *12 n.13, citing Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
In West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Most of us watch politics in the United States with alarm. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]